Soybean seed growth dynamics exposed to heat and water stress during the filling period under field conditions

Soybean production can be affected by heat (HS) and water stress (WS). However, studies on effects of stresses combination under field conditions are still scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of HS, WS and their interaction (HS x WS) during seed filling on seed weight, see...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Veas, Rodolfo E. A., Ergo, Verónica, Vega, Claudia Rosa Cecilia, Lascano, Ramiro H., Rondanini, Déborah Paola, Carrera, Constanza Soledad
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2021veas.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 04015cab a22004097a 4500
001 20231205115025.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20240223135702.0
008 231205t2021 xxud||||o|||| 00| 0 eng d
999 |c 55931  |d 55931 
999 |d 55931 
999 |d 55931 
999 |d 55931 
022 |a 1439-037X 
024 |a 10.1111/jac.12523 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 0 0 |a Soybean seed growth dynamics exposed to heat and water stress during the filling period under field conditions 
520 |a Soybean production can be affected by heat (HS) and water stress (WS). However, studies on effects of stresses combination under field conditions are still scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of HS, WS and their interaction (HS x WS) during seed filling on seed weight, seed growth rate (SGR) and seed filling duration (SFD) of same phenological age pods from different canopy positions. Two soybean genotypes were exposed to four treatments during seed filling: control (irrigated plots at ambient temperature), HS (plots under temperatures >32°C for 6 hr/day during 15 days), WS (plots under 25% of soil water content, during entire seed filling) and HS x WS. Stresses interaction caused similar responses to WS alone, decreasing yield and its components (seed number and weight), as well as seed weight for each canopy position (SWCP), SGR and SFD. Non-significant effect of irrigated HS and non-additive effects was observed in HS x WS plots, exhibiting WS a dominant effect over HS. The SWcp strongly correlated with SGR, exhibiting upper position a trend to higher SWCP than lower one. Seed maximum water content and pod weight, positively associated with SWCP, indicated seed metabolic limitations under WS and HS x WS. Our results advance in the understanding of SW determination under abiotic stresses and highlight the importance of identifying pods of same phenological age to establish accurate comparisons between seeds from different canopy positions. 
650 |2 Agrovoc  |9 26 
653 |a CANOPY POSITION 
653 |a DROUGHT 
653 |a GLYCINE MAX 
653 |a HIGH TEMPERATURE 
653 |a SEED FILLING DURATION 
653 |a SEED GROWTH RATE 
700 1 |a Veas, Rodolfo E. A.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CIAP). Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA). Córdoba, Argentina.  |9 75578 
700 1 |a Ergo, Verónica  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CIAP). Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA). Córdoba, Argentina.  |u CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 74042 
700 1 |a Vega, Claudia Rosa Cecilia  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi (EEA Manfredi). Córdoba, Argentina.  |9 58112 
700 1 |a Lascano, Ramiro H.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CIAP). Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA). Córdoba, Argentina.  |u CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales (FCEFyN-UNC). Cátedra de Fisiología Vegetal. Córdoba, Argentina.  |9 75579 
700 1 |a Rondanini, Déborah Paola  |u CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 11330 
700 1 |a Carrera, Constanza Soledad  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CIAP). Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA). Córdoba, Argentina.  |u CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 50262 
773 0 |t Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science  |g Vol.208, no.4 (2021), p.472-485, tbls., grafs.  |w SECS000107 
856 |f 2021veas  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2021veas.pdf  |x  ARTI202311 
856 |u http://www.wiley.com/  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG