Toward understanding the dynamics of land change in Latin America potential utility of a resilience approach for building archetypes of landsystems change

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

Climate change, financial shocks, and fluctuations in international trade are some of the reasons why resilience is increasingly invoked in discussions about land-use policy. However, resilience assessments come with the challenge of operationalization, upscaling their conclusions while considering...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Rocha, Juan C., Baraibar, Matilda M., Deutsch, Lisa, Bremond, Ariane de, Oestreicher, Jordan S., Rositano, Florencia, Gelabert, Cecilia Corina
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
ARCHETYPES
LAND-USE CHANGE
LATIN AMERICA
REGIME SHIFTS
RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2019rocha.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
Biblioteca Central (FAUBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
LEADER 04601nab a22004577a 4500
001 20190807104732.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20201230093033.0
008 190807t2019 xxcdb|||o|||| 00| | eng d
999 |c 47531  |d 47531 
999 |d 47531 
999 |d 47531 
999 |d 47531 
999 |d 47531 
999 |d 47531 
999 |d 47531 
999 |d 47531 
999 |d 47531 
022 |a 1708-3087 
024 |a 10.5751/ES-10349-240117 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Toward understanding the dynamics of land change in Latin America  |b potential utility of a resilience approach for building archetypes of landsystems change 
520 |a Climate change, financial shocks, and fluctuations in international trade are some of the reasons why resilience is increasingly invoked in discussions about land-use policy. However, resilience assessments come with the challenge of operationalization, upscaling their conclusions while considering the context-specific nature of land-use dynamics and the common lack of long-term data. We revisit the approach of system archetypes for identifying resilience surrogates and apply it to land-use systems using seven case studies spread across Latin America. The approach relies on expert knowledge and literature-based characterizations of key processes and patterns of land-use change synthesized in a data template. These narrative accounts are then used to guide development of causal networks, from which potential surrogates for resilience are identified. This initial test of the method shows that deforestation, international trade, technological improvements, and conservation initiatives are key drivers of land-use change, and that rural migration, leasing and land pricing, conflicts in property rights, and international spillovers are common causal pathways that underlie land-use transitions. Our study demonstrates how archetypes can help to differentiate what is generic from context dependant. They help identify common causal pathways and leverage points across cases to further elucidate how policies work and where, as well as what policy lessons might transfer across heterogeneous settings. 
653 |a ARCHETYPES 
653 |a LAND-USE CHANGE 
653 |a LATIN AMERICA 
653 |a REGIME SHIFTS 
653 |a RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT 
700 1 |a Rocha, Juan C.  |u Stockholm University. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Stockholm, Suecia.  |u Swedish Royal Academy of Science. Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics. Stockholm, Suecia.  |9 69107 
700 1 |a Baraibar, Matilda M.  |u Stockholm University. Department of Economic History and International Relations. Stockholm, Suecia.  |u Stockholm University. Institute of Latin American Studies. Stockholm, Suecia.  |9 69108 
700 1 |a Deutsch, Lisa  |u Stockholm University. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Stockholm, Suecia.  |u Stockholm University. Institute of Latin American Studies. Stockholm, Suecia.  |9 69109 
700 1 |a Bremond, Ariane de  |u University of Bern. Centre for Development and Environment. Bern, Suiza.  |u International Programme Office. Global Land Programme. Suiza.  |u University of Maryland. College Park. Maryland. EE. UU.  |9 69110 
700 1 |a Oestreicher, Jordan S.  |u Universidade de Brasília. Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Distrito Federal, Brasil.  |9 69112 
700 1 |9 27337  |a Rositano, Florencia  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 21202  |a Gelabert, Cecilia Corina  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Economía, Desarrollo y Planeamiento Agrícola. Cátedra de Sistemas Agroalimentarios. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales. Área de Producción vegetal con énfasis en sistemas agroalimentarios sustentables. Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina. 
773 |t Ecology and Society  |w SECS000926  |g vol.24, no.1 (2019), e17, 82 p., tbls., grafs., mapas 
856 |f 2019rocha  |i en internet  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2019rocha.pdf  |x ARTI201908 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR  |u https://www.resalliance.org 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG 

Ejemplares similares