Patagonian shrubs drought or grazing tolerance?
Features that confer plants tolerance to drought also provide tolerance to herbivory. Therefore, even the plants of arid zones with a short grazing history would be tolerant to herbivory. Evolutionary history of grazing in central and northwest Patagonian steppes has been considered brief and domina...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2011Golluscio.pdf LINK AL EDITOR |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 07978cab a22016097a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | AR-BaUFA000163 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUFA | ||
| 005 | 20230816100316.0 | ||
| 008 | 181208t2011 |||||o|||||00||||spa d | ||
| 999 | |c 46597 |d 46597 | ||
| 022 | |a 0327-5477 | ||
| 040 | |a AR-BaUFA |c AR-BaUFA | ||
| 100 | 1 | |9 729 |a Golluscio, Rodolfo Angel | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Patagonian shrubs |b drought or grazing tolerance? |
| 246 | 0 | 0 | |a Arbustos de la estepa patagónica |
| 520 | |a Features that confer plants tolerance to drought also provide tolerance to herbivory. Therefore, even the plants of arid zones with a short grazing history would be tolerant to herbivory. Evolutionary history of grazing in central and northwest Patagonian steppes has been considered brief and dominant spiny shrubs have been considered adapted to tolerate drought. Here, we present experimental evidences that question that conceptual model. [1] The three most conspicuous shrubs in the dominant community at south-western Chubut [Mulinum spinosum, Adesmia volckmanni and Senecio filaginoides] are not subjected to severe water stress conditions because their roots explore deep soil layers with relatively high water potentials almost all year. That is reflected in high leaf water potential, high isotopic discrimination against heavy carbon isotope and low response to rainfall. [2] Instead, the three shrubs show evasion herbivory strategies. M. spinosum and A. volckmanni have very aggressive thorns, while S. filaginoides has a high content of carbon-based secondary metabolites. These chemical compounds are believed to have an anti-herbivory role. Besides that, in two of these three species, levels of physical or chemical defences were increased under grazing conditions. [3] Finally, as defensive strategies do not preclude herbivore consumption in absolute terms, shrubs are important components of sheep diet. Sheeps eat leaves of non-chemically defended species and flowers of all of them. These evidences suggest that grazing pressure of native herbivores would have been high and persistent enough to promote natural selection processes that conducted to dominance of grazing resistant shrub genotypes. | ||
| 653 | 0 | |a DESERTIFICATION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a HERBIVORY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a WATER STRESS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a WOODY PLANTS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ARID ENVIRONMENT | |
| 653 | 0 | |a CARBON ISOTOPE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a CHEMICAL DEFENSE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a DESERTIFICATION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a DOMINANCE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a DROUGHT RESISTANCE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a EXPERIMENTAL STUDY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a GENOTYPE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a GRAZING | |
| 653 | 0 | |a GRAZING PRESSURE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a MORPHOLOGY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a NATURAL SELECTION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PLANT COMMUNITY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PRECIPITATION INTENSITY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ROOT SYSTEM | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SECONDARY METABOLITE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SHEEP | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SHRUB | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SOIL WATER POTENTIAL | |
| 653 | 0 | |a STEPPE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a WATER STRESS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a WOODY PLANT | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ARGENTINA | |
| 653 | 0 | |a CHUBUT | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PATAGONIA | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ADESMIA VOLCKMANNII | |
| 653 | 0 | |a MULINUM SPINOSUM | |
| 653 | 0 | |a OVIS ARIES | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SENECIO | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SENECIO FILAGINOIDES | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 11138 |a Cavagnaro, Fernando Pablo | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 29174 |a Valenta, Magalí Débora | |
| 773 | |t Ecologia Austral |g Vol.21, no.1 (2011), p.61-70 | ||
| 856 | |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2011Golluscio.pdf |i En internet |q application/pdf |f 2011Golluscio |x MIGRADOS2018 | ||
| 856 | |u http://www.asaeargentina.com.ar/ |x MIGRADOS2018 |z LINK AL EDITOR | ||
| 900 | |a as | ||
| 900 | |a 20131220 | ||
| 900 | |a N | ||
| 900 | |a OA | ||
| 900 | |a SCOPUS | ||
| 900 | |a a | ||
| 900 | |a s | ||
| 900 | |a ARTICULO | ||
| 900 | |a EN LINEA | ||
| 900 | |a 03275477 | ||
| 900 | |a ^tPatagonian shrubs^sdrought or grazing tolerance? | ||
| 900 | |a ^tArbustos de la estepa patagónica^s¿adaptados a tolerar la sequía o el pastoreo? | ||
| 900 | |a ^aGolluscio^bR.A. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCavagnaro^bF.P. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aValenta^bM.D. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aGolluscio^bR. A. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCavagnaro^bF. P. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aValenta^bM. D. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aGolluscio^bR.A.^tFacultad de AgronomÃa, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCavagnaro^bF.P.^tIFEVA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aValenta^bM.D. | ||
| 900 | |a ^tEcologia Austral^cEcol. Austral | ||
| 900 | |a es | ||
| 900 | |a 61 | ||
| 900 | |a ^i | ||
| 900 | |a Vol. 21, no. 1 | ||
| 900 | |a 70 | ||
| 900 | |a DESERTIFICATION | ||
| 900 | |a HERBIVORY | ||
| 900 | |a WATER STRESS | ||
| 900 | |a WOODY PLANTS | ||
| 900 | |a ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSE | ||
| 900 | |a ARID ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 900 | |a CARBON ISOTOPE | ||
| 900 | |a CHEMICAL DEFENSE | ||
| 900 | |a DESERTIFICATION | ||
| 900 | |a DOMINANCE | ||
| 900 | |a DROUGHT RESISTANCE | ||
| 900 | |a EXPERIMENTAL STUDY | ||
| 900 | |a GENOTYPE | ||
| 900 | |a GRAZING | ||
| 900 | |a GRAZING PRESSURE | ||
| 900 | |a ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION | ||
| 900 | |a MORPHOLOGY | ||
| 900 | |a NATURAL SELECTION | ||
| 900 | |a PLANT COMMUNITY | ||
| 900 | |a PRECIPITATION INTENSITY | ||
| 900 | |a ROOT SYSTEM | ||
| 900 | |a SECONDARY METABOLITE | ||
| 900 | |a SHEEP | ||
| 900 | |a SHRUB | ||
| 900 | |a SOIL WATER POTENTIAL | ||
| 900 | |a STEPPE | ||
| 900 | |a WATER STRESS | ||
| 900 | |a WOODY PLANT | ||
| 900 | |a ARGENTINA | ||
| 900 | |a CHUBUT | ||
| 900 | |a PATAGONIA | ||
| 900 | |a ADESMIA VOLCKMANNII | ||
| 900 | |a MULINUM SPINOSUM | ||
| 900 | |a OVIS ARIES | ||
| 900 | |a SENECIO | ||
| 900 | |a SENECIO FILAGINOIDES | ||
| 900 | |a Features that confer plants tolerance to drought also provide tolerance to herbivory. Therefore, even the plants of arid zones with a short grazing history would be tolerant to herbivory. Evolutionary history of grazing in central and northwest Patagonian steppes has been considered brief and dominant spiny shrubs have been considered adapted to tolerate drought. Here, we present experimental evidences that question that conceptual model. [1] The three most conspicuous shrubs in the dominant community at south-western Chubut [Mulinum spinosum, Adesmia volckmanni and Senecio filaginoides] are not subjected to severe water stress conditions because their roots explore deep soil layers with relatively high water potentials almost all year. That is reflected in high leaf water potential, high isotopic discrimination against heavy carbon isotope and low response to rainfall. [2] Instead, the three shrubs show evasion herbivory strategies. M. spinosum and A. volckmanni have very aggressive thorns, while S. filaginoides has a high content of carbon-based secondary metabolites. These chemical compounds are believed to have an anti-herbivory role. Besides that, in two of these three species, levels of physical or chemical defences were increased under grazing conditions. [3] Finally, as defensive strategies do not preclude herbivore consumption in absolute terms, shrubs are important components of sheep diet. Sheeps eat leaves of non-chemically defended species and flowers of all of them. These evidences suggest that grazing pressure of native herbivores would have been high and persistent enough to promote natural selection processes that conducted to dominance of grazing resistant shrub genotypes. | ||
| 900 | |a 21 | ||
| 900 | |a 1 | ||
| 900 | |a 2011 | ||
| 900 | |a ^cH | ||
| 900 | |a AAG | ||
| 900 | |a AGROVOC | ||
| 900 | |a 2011Golluscio | ||
| 900 | |a AAG | ||
| 900 | |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2011Golluscio.pdf | ||
| 900 | |a 2011Golluscio.pdf | ||
| 900 | |a http://www.asaeargentina.com.ar/ | ||
| 900 | |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79955569198&partnerID=40&md5=874e88cbf5167686732318d7125a6895 | ||
| 900 | |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i | ||
| 900 | |a OS | ||
| 942 | 0 | 0 | |c ARTICULO |2 udc |
| 942 | 0 | 0 | |c ENLINEA |2 udc |