PULPOTOMY OR PULPECTOMY: CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS IN PRIMARY TEETH

Objective: To compare the clinical and radiographic success rate between PE and PO in temporal teeth. Methodology: Quasi-experimental study. All patients with a diagnosis of pulp therapy were included and were treated between August 2013 and September 2014 at the Odontopediatrics Clinic of the Facul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orellana Centeno, José Eduardo, Gaytán Hernández, D.
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Escuela de Salud Pública y Ambiente. Fac. Cs. Médicas UNC 2020
Materias:
Pulpotomia
Pulpectomia
Dentes decíduos
Salud
Odontología
Pulpoctomy
Pulpectomy
Deciduous teeth
Dentistry
Health
odontologia
saúde
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/28559
Aporte de:
Revista de Salud Pública de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R360-article-28559
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-360
container_title_str Revista de Salud Pública
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Pulpotomia
Pulpectomia
Dentes decíduos
Salud
Odontología
Pulpoctomy
Pulpectomy
Deciduous teeth
Dentistry
Health
Pulpotomia
Pulpectomia
Dentes decíduos
odontologia
saúde
spellingShingle Pulpotomia
Pulpectomia
Dentes decíduos
Salud
Odontología
Pulpoctomy
Pulpectomy
Deciduous teeth
Dentistry
Health
Pulpotomia
Pulpectomia
Dentes decíduos
odontologia
saúde
Orellana Centeno, José Eduardo
Gaytán Hernández, D.
PULPOTOMY OR PULPECTOMY: CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS IN PRIMARY TEETH
topic_facet Pulpotomia
Pulpectomia
Dentes decíduos
Salud
Odontología
Pulpoctomy
Pulpectomy
Deciduous teeth
Dentistry
Health
Pulpotomia
Pulpectomia
Dentes decíduos
odontologia
saúde
author Orellana Centeno, José Eduardo
Gaytán Hernández, D.
author_facet Orellana Centeno, José Eduardo
Gaytán Hernández, D.
author_sort Orellana Centeno, José Eduardo
title PULPOTOMY OR PULPECTOMY: CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS IN PRIMARY TEETH
title_short PULPOTOMY OR PULPECTOMY: CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS IN PRIMARY TEETH
title_full PULPOTOMY OR PULPECTOMY: CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS IN PRIMARY TEETH
title_fullStr PULPOTOMY OR PULPECTOMY: CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS IN PRIMARY TEETH
title_full_unstemmed PULPOTOMY OR PULPECTOMY: CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS IN PRIMARY TEETH
title_sort pulpotomy or pulpectomy: clinical and radiographic success in primary teeth
description Objective: To compare the clinical and radiographic success rate between PE and PO in temporal teeth. Methodology: Quasi-experimental study. All patients with a diagnosis of pulp therapy were included and were treated between August 2013 and September 2014 at the Odontopediatrics Clinic of the Faculty of Stomatology of the Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí (UASLP). A total of 107 subjects (to the 256 dental organs of the 158 patients (128 PE and 128 PO) were treated according to the rules of the American Association of Pediatric Dentistry. Clinical and radiographic success was evaluated at 7, 15, 30, 90, 180 and 360 days post-treatment using the Zurn-Seale scale Success rates were compared with logistic regression adjusted for sex and age. Results: The clinical success rate for pulpotomy (91.5%) and pulpectomy (P <0.05) and pulpotomy (87.5%) and pulpotomy success (81.4%) and pulpectomy (83.3%). After 360 days, there was no significant difference between pulpectomy and pulpotomy, clinically OR = 1.54 (0.44-5.40) p = 0.49 and Radiographically OR = 0.87 (0.32-2.37) p = 0.79. Discussion: Both pulp therapies are suitable for temporary teeth with a diagnosis of pulpal disease, since according to the results obtained no difference between the two treatments is observed.
publisher Escuela de Salud Pública y Ambiente. Fac. Cs. Médicas UNC
publishDate 2020
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/28559
work_keys_str_mv AT orellanacentenojoseeduardo pulpotomyorpulpectomyclinicalandradiographicsuccessinprimaryteeth
AT gaytanhernandezd pulpotomyorpulpectomyclinicalandradiographicsuccessinprimaryteeth
AT orellanacentenojoseeduardo pulpotomiaopulpectomiaexitoclinicoyradiograficoendientestemporales
AT gaytanhernandezd pulpotomiaopulpectomiaexitoclinicoyradiograficoendientestemporales
AT orellanacentenojoseeduardo pulpotomiaoupulpectomiasucessoclinicoeradiograficonosdentesdeciduos
AT gaytanhernandezd pulpotomiaoupulpectomiasucessoclinicoeradiograficonosdentesdeciduos
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:26:58Z
last_indexed 2025-05-10T05:22:07Z
_version_ 1833249819202682880
spelling I10-R360-article-285592025-04-03T12:05:43Z PULPOTOMY OR PULPECTOMY: CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS IN PRIMARY TEETH Pulpotomia o Pulpectomia: Éxito clínico y radiográfico en dientes temporales PULPOTOMIA OU PULPECTOMIA: SUCESSO CLÍNICO E RADIOGRÁFICO NOS DENTES DECÍDUOS Orellana Centeno, José Eduardo Gaytán Hernández, D. Pulpotomia Pulpectomia Dentes decíduos Salud Odontología Pulpoctomy Pulpectomy Deciduous teeth Dentistry Health Pulpotomia Pulpectomia Dentes decíduos odontologia saúde Objective: To compare the clinical and radiographic success rate between PE and PO in temporal teeth. Methodology: Quasi-experimental study. All patients with a diagnosis of pulp therapy were included and were treated between August 2013 and September 2014 at the Odontopediatrics Clinic of the Faculty of Stomatology of the Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí (UASLP). A total of 107 subjects (to the 256 dental organs of the 158 patients (128 PE and 128 PO) were treated according to the rules of the American Association of Pediatric Dentistry. Clinical and radiographic success was evaluated at 7, 15, 30, 90, 180 and 360 days post-treatment using the Zurn-Seale scale Success rates were compared with logistic regression adjusted for sex and age. Results: The clinical success rate for pulpotomy (91.5%) and pulpectomy (P <0.05) and pulpotomy (87.5%) and pulpotomy success (81.4%) and pulpectomy (83.3%). After 360 days, there was no significant difference between pulpectomy and pulpotomy, clinically OR = 1.54 (0.44-5.40) p = 0.49 and Radiographically OR = 0.87 (0.32-2.37) p = 0.79. Discussion: Both pulp therapies are suitable for temporary teeth with a diagnosis of pulpal disease, since according to the results obtained no difference between the two treatments is observed. Objetivo: Comparar la tasa de éxito clínico y radiográfico entre PE y PO en dientes temporales. Metodología: Estudio cuasi-experimental. Se incluyó a todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de terapia pulpar y fueron tratados entre agosto 2013 hasta septiembre de 2014 en la Clínica de Odontopediatría de la Facultad de Estomatología de la Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (UASLP). Un total de 107 sujetos (a los 256 órganos dentales de los 158 pacientes (128 PE y 128 PO). Los tratamientos fueron realizados según la normativa de la Asociación Americana de Odontopediatría. Se evaluó el éxito clínico y radiográfico a los 7, 15, 30, 90, 180 y 360 días post-tratamiento mediante la escala de Zurn-Seale. Las tasas de éxito se compararon con regresión logística ajustada por sexo y edad. Resultados: La tasa de éxito clínico para pulpotomía (91.5%) y de pulpectomía (87.5%) y de éxito radiográfico para pulpotomía (81.4%) y de pulpectomía (83.3%). Después de 360 días, no presento diferencias significativas entre la pulpectomía y pulpotomía, clínicamente OR= 1.54 (0.44-5.40) p= 0.49 y radiográficamente OR= 0.87 (0.32-2.37) p=0.79. Discusión: Ambas terapias pulpares son adecuadas para dientes temporales con diagnóstico de enfermedad pulpar, ya que de acuerdo a los resultados obtenidos no se observa diferencia entre ambos tratamientos. Objetivo: Comparar a taxa de sucesso clínico e radiográfico entre PE e PO em dentesdecíduos. Metodologia: Estudo quase experimental. Todos os pacientes com diagnósticode terapia pulpar foram incluídos e tratados entre agosto de 2013 e setembro de 2014 naClínica de Odontopediatria da Faculdade de Estomatologia da Universidade Autônoma deSan Luis Potosí (UASLP). Um total de 107 indivíduos (para os 256 órgãos dentários dos158 pacientes (128 PE e 128 PO). Os tratamentos foram realizados de acordo com os regulamentosda Associação Americana de Odontologia Pediátrica. O sucesso clínico e radiográficofoi avaliado aos 7, 15, 30, 90, 180 e 360 dias pós-tratamento utilizando a escala deZurn-Seale. As taxas de sucesso foram comparadas com regressão logística ajustada parasexo e idade. Resultados: A taxa de sucesso clínico para pulpotomia (91,5%) e para pulpectomia(87,5%) e sucesso radiográfico para pulpotomia (81,4%) e pulpectomia (83,3%).Após 360 dias, não apresentou diferenças significativas entre pulpectomia e pulpotomia,clinicamente OR = 1,54 (0,44-5,40) p = 0,49 e radiograficamente OR = 0,87 (0,32-2,37) p = 0,79 Discussão: Ambas as terapias pulpares são indicadas para dentes decíduos comdiagnóstico de doença pulpar, pois de acordo com os resultados obtidos não se observadiferença entre os dois tratamentos.Mensagem principal: As terapias pulpares apresentam suas taxas de sucesso clínico e radiográfico,mas não fazem uma comparação entre as duas para medir sua eficácia e nãosubmeterem o paciente infantil à dor e às consultas subsequentes devido à terapia pulparanterior, sendo o diagnóstico chave para evitar complicações através da odontologia baseadaem evidências. Na saúde pública a economia monetária de tratamentos desnecessáriose incorretos, evita dor e desconforto ao paciente infantil e propõe a utilização deterapias pulpares dentro dos catálogos de saúde bucal para o cuidado da saúde infantil ecomo prevenção da perda do órgão dentário . Escuela de Salud Pública y Ambiente. Fac. Cs. Médicas UNC 2020-10-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/28559 Revista de Salud Pública; Vol. 24 Núm. 3 (2020): Revista de Salud Pública; 8-17 1852-9429 1853-1180 10.31052/1853.1180.v24.n3 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/28559/31324 Derechos de autor 2020 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Ejemplares similares