Gaïa and diplomacy as a cosmopolitical device. Interview with Bruno Latour

The questions that give body to the interview were developed within the 'Nucleo NaturalezaCultura'. Our interests were linked to the discussion of the nature-culture pair, as it is currently being discussed in an anthropology interested in the so-called 'ontological turn'. In thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marconetto, María Bernarda, Pazzarelli, Francisco Gustavo
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/9191
Aporte de:
id I10-R372-article-9191
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R372-article-91912024-11-04T18:07:44Z Gaïa and diplomacy as a cosmopolitical device. Interview with Bruno Latour Gaïa y la diplomacia como dispositivo cosmopolítico. Entrevista a Bruno Latour Marconetto, María Bernarda Pazzarelli, Francisco Gustavo naturaleza-cultura cosmopolítica modos de existencia Bruno Latour nature-culture cosmopolitics ways of existing Bruno Latour The questions that give body to the interview were developed within the 'Nucleo NaturalezaCultura'. Our interests were linked to the discussion of the nature-culture pair, as it is currently being discussed in an anthropology interested in the so-called 'ontological turn'. In this context, Bruno Latour's work constitutes an indisputable turning point when considering the political, ecological and 'cosmopolitical' consequences of this 'turn'. Defender of a symmetrical anthropology, he has not only taken care of 're-assembling the social' through his notion of 'collectives', but he has managed to 'symmetrize' the anthropologies of the 'margins' (indigenous ethnology, among them) with that anthropology practiced in the centres, among the 'modern' ones. Thus, for example, while ethnologists were dedicated to investigate the distinction nature-culture in the Amazon as defined by indigenous cosmologies, he himself was dedicated to understanding how this binarism was manufactured in scientific laboratories, within our modern cosmology. In this interview, carried out in his Medialab de Sciences Po, in Paris, he covers part of his career and gives us some details of his project that allow us to continue reviving those current discussions that, faced with the 'ecological emergencies' embodied in Gaïa, place 'diplomacy' as a 'cosmopolitical' device. Las preguntas que dan cuerpo a la entrevista se gestaron en el seno del ‘Núcleo NaturalezaCultura’. Nuestros intereses, se vincularon a la discusión del par naturaleza-cultura, tal y como se lo discute actualmente en una antropología interesada por el denominado ‘giro ontológico’. En este contexto, la obra de Bruno Latour constituye un punto de inflexión indiscutible al momento de considerar las consecuencias políticas, ecológicas y ‘cosmopolíticas’ de este ‘giro’. Defensor de una antropología simétrica, no sólo se ha ocupado de volver a ‘reensamblar lo social’ mediante su noción de ‘colectivos’, sino que ha logrado ‘simetrizar’ a las antropologías de los ‘márgenes’ (la etnología indígena, entre ellas) con aquella antropología practicada en los centros, entre los ‘modernos’. Así, por ejemplo, mientras los etnólogos se dedicaban a indagar la distinción naturaleza-cultura en el Amazonas tal y como la definían las cosmologías indígenas, él mismo se dedicaba a comprender cómo ese binarismo era fabricado en los laboratorios científicos, dentro de nuestra cosmología moderna. En esta entrevista, realizada en su Medialab de Sciences Po, en París, él recorre parte de su trayectoria y nos brinda algunas precisiones de su proyecto que permiten seguir avivando aquellas discusiones actuales que, ante las ‘urgencias ecológicas’ encarnadas en Gaïa, ubican a la ‘diplomacia’ como un dispositivo ‘cosmopolítico’. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2014-10-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed article Artículo revisado por pares Artigo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/9191 10.31048/1852.4826.v7.n2.9191 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2014); 397-402 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2014); 397-402 Revista del Museo de Antropología; v. 7 n. 2 (2014); 397-402 1852-4826 1852-060X 10.31048/1852.4826.v7.n2 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/9191/10244 Derechos de autor 2014 María Bernarda Marconetto, Francisco Gustavo Pazzarelli
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-372
container_title_str Revista del Museo de Antropología
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic naturaleza-cultura
cosmopolítica
modos de existencia
Bruno Latour
nature-culture
cosmopolitics
ways of existing
Bruno Latour
spellingShingle naturaleza-cultura
cosmopolítica
modos de existencia
Bruno Latour
nature-culture
cosmopolitics
ways of existing
Bruno Latour
Marconetto, María Bernarda
Pazzarelli, Francisco Gustavo
Gaïa and diplomacy as a cosmopolitical device. Interview with Bruno Latour
topic_facet naturaleza-cultura
cosmopolítica
modos de existencia
Bruno Latour
nature-culture
cosmopolitics
ways of existing
Bruno Latour
author Marconetto, María Bernarda
Pazzarelli, Francisco Gustavo
author_facet Marconetto, María Bernarda
Pazzarelli, Francisco Gustavo
author_sort Marconetto, María Bernarda
title Gaïa and diplomacy as a cosmopolitical device. Interview with Bruno Latour
title_short Gaïa and diplomacy as a cosmopolitical device. Interview with Bruno Latour
title_full Gaïa and diplomacy as a cosmopolitical device. Interview with Bruno Latour
title_fullStr Gaïa and diplomacy as a cosmopolitical device. Interview with Bruno Latour
title_full_unstemmed Gaïa and diplomacy as a cosmopolitical device. Interview with Bruno Latour
title_sort gaïa and diplomacy as a cosmopolitical device. interview with bruno latour
description The questions that give body to the interview were developed within the 'Nucleo NaturalezaCultura'. Our interests were linked to the discussion of the nature-culture pair, as it is currently being discussed in an anthropology interested in the so-called 'ontological turn'. In this context, Bruno Latour's work constitutes an indisputable turning point when considering the political, ecological and 'cosmopolitical' consequences of this 'turn'. Defender of a symmetrical anthropology, he has not only taken care of 're-assembling the social' through his notion of 'collectives', but he has managed to 'symmetrize' the anthropologies of the 'margins' (indigenous ethnology, among them) with that anthropology practiced in the centres, among the 'modern' ones. Thus, for example, while ethnologists were dedicated to investigate the distinction nature-culture in the Amazon as defined by indigenous cosmologies, he himself was dedicated to understanding how this binarism was manufactured in scientific laboratories, within our modern cosmology. In this interview, carried out in his Medialab de Sciences Po, in Paris, he covers part of his career and gives us some details of his project that allow us to continue reviving those current discussions that, faced with the 'ecological emergencies' embodied in Gaïa, place 'diplomacy' as a 'cosmopolitical' device.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología
publishDate 2014
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/9191
work_keys_str_mv AT marconettomariabernarda gaiaanddiplomacyasacosmopoliticaldeviceinterviewwithbrunolatour
AT pazzarellifranciscogustavo gaiaanddiplomacyasacosmopoliticaldeviceinterviewwithbrunolatour
AT marconettomariabernarda gaiayladiplomaciacomodispositivocosmopoliticoentrevistaabrunolatour
AT pazzarellifranciscogustavo gaiayladiplomaciacomodispositivocosmopoliticoentrevistaabrunolatour
first_indexed 2024-09-03T20:02:21Z
last_indexed 2025-03-27T05:34:18Z
_version_ 1827724232658780160