The Subject and Subjectivity: the Problems of Permanence and Transformation in Psychoanalysis
This work considers the distinction between the Subject and the subjectivity to develop certain topics related with the problems of permanence and transformation in psychoanalysis. Firstly, we will consider the work of S. Bleichmar to demonstrate the way in which this author seeks to ensure the vali...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/197 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This work considers the distinction between the Subject and the subjectivity to develop certain topics related with the problems of permanence and transformation in psychoanalysis. Firstly, we will consider the work of S. Bleichmar to demonstrate the way in which this author seeks to ensure the validity of the psychoanalytic practice by means of the Subject that, due to its constitutive relation with the law, remains the same despite all the historical and political transformations given in the field of subjectivity. Secondly, we will consider the work of J. Alemán to demonstrate the way in which this author rela- tes the possibility of political resistance with the Subject that, due to its structural relation with the language, constitutes an element of permanence that resists the historical and political productions of subjectivity. In both these authors, such important motifs as the clinical and the political ones depend on that element of permanence that is the Subject in opposition with the transformations that take place in the field of subjectivity. Lastly, the- se propositions will let us discuss the relation of the law, which in both cases constitutes the element that ensures the permanence of the Subject, with the historical and political transformations that are problematic in these perspectives. |
|---|