To rust or to resist. 1956 metallurgical conflict and the right to strike in dispute in labor courts in the prelude to Article 14 bis
In late 1956, metalworkers staged a strike for better wages and working conditions. The paralysis of activities in one of the most important branches of economic activity occurred within the framework of the dictatorship that had overthrown Perón the previous year. The military authorities, through...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR)
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/1824 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In late 1956, metalworkers staged a strike for better wages and working conditions. The paralysis of activities in one of the most important branches of economic activity occurred within the framework of the dictatorship that had overthrown Perón the previous year. The military authorities, through the Ministry of Labour, used a resolution of the Peronist government to quickly declare the strike illegal. Once the conflict was resolved, workers dismissed during the conflict and were not reinstated decided to seek justice in the Labour Courts.
Based on the analysis of files from the Quilmes jurisdiction, the hypothesis will be proposed that labour justice acquired, in a repressive context and clearly of retroversion of workers' rights, the character of containment against the advance of the state and employers. It is within this context that the right to strike was contested in courts by the workers themselves. At the same time, it allows us to reflect on the scope of the repressive reformulation of the labour world carried out by the Libertadora and the impact of union reorganization on the forms of conflict. |
|---|