Decision for intuition and decision for representation: Georges Sorel and Carl Schmitt facing the crisis of Rule of Law

In this article I review Schmitt's references to Sorel, trying to demonstrate that where Schmitt pretends to agree with Sorel (mostly in the criticism of the Rule of Law), significant philosophical differences nevertheless persist. To this end, I disaggregate decisionism into three analytical d...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chaia De Bellis, Jonás
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Grupo Prohistoria 2023
Materias:
Georges Sorel
Carl Schmitt
decisionismo
vitalismo
Estado de Derecho
George Sorel
Carlos Schmitt
Decisionismo
Vitalismo
Estado de Direito
decisionism
vitalism
Rule of Law
Acceso en línea:https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1848
Aporte de:
Prohistoria. Historia, políticas de la historia (CONICET) de Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Ejemplares similares

Ejemplares similares