There exists circularity between WACC and value? Another solution.
Although we know there exists a simple approach to solve the circularity between value and the discount rate, known as the Adjusted Present Value proposed by Myers, 1974, it seems that practitioners still rely on the traditional Weighted Average Cost of Capital, WACC approach of weighting the cost o...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Icesi
2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10906/803 http://www.icesi.edu.co/revistas/index.php/estudios_gerenciales/article/view/182 http://biblioteca2.icesi.edu.co/cgi-olib/?infile=details.glu&loid=161095 http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=co/co-008&d=10906803oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Although we know there exists a simple
approach to solve the circularity
between value and the discount rate,
known as the Adjusted Present Value
proposed by Myers, 1974, it seems
that practitioners still rely on the
traditional Weighted Average Cost of
Capital, WACC approach of weighting
the cost of debt, Kd and the cost
of equity, Ke and discounting the Free
Cash Flow, FCF. We show how to solve
circularity when calculating value
with the free cash flow, FCF and the
WACC. As a result of the solution we
arrive at a known solution when we
assume the discount rate of the tax
equity: the capital cash flow, CCF discounted
at Ku. When assuming Kd
as the discount rate for the tax savings,
we find an expression for calculating
value that does not implies
circularity. We do this for a single
period and for N periods. |
|---|