Amo, esclavo y los Sin Tierra
This article compares between the Master and Slave dialectic and the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement (MST). This movement presents new elements that are beyond the traditional analysis criteria in such fields as religion, health and education. According to Tilman Evers popular movements in Latin...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo científico |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Xochimilco
2002
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=26701712 http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-024&d=26701712oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This article compares between the Master and Slave dialectic and the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement (MST). This movement presents new elements that are beyond the traditional analysis criteria in such fields as religion, health and education. According to Tilman Evers popular movements in Latin America can be divided into three periods. In the first one, from 60s to 70s, the movements are identified with terrorist actions. In the second period, popular movements become closer to human rights and are accepted by public opinion. Considering MST as a new social movement, we can see its originality in the treatment of religion, health and education policies. Power relationships can no longer be analyzed in terms of traditional polar oppositions and demand new formulations. |
|---|