Estudio comparativo de recuperación de formas parasitarias por tres diferentes métodos de enriquecimiento coproparasitológico
A total of 165 fecal samples were analyzed, using two sedimentation methods: Ritchie (R), Carles Barthelemy (CB), and one of flotation: Willis (W), in order to optimize intestinal parasites diagnosis and to determine the techniques effectiveness. Parasites were found in 119 (72,12%) of those analyze...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Articulo Comunicacion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/109497 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | A total of 165 fecal samples were analyzed, using two sedimentation methods: Ritchie (R), Carles Barthelemy (CB), and one of flotation: Willis (W), in order to optimize intestinal parasites diagnosis and to determine the techniques effectiveness. Parasites were found in 119 (72,12%) of those analyzed.
Significant differences were in protozoa recovery (p < 0,001), being observed 81.4% (R), 77.4% (CB), and 57.8% (W). Blastocystis hominis, Giardia lamblia, Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura were recovered more frequency by means of sedimentation, being Ritchie´s method the most effective one (p < 0.05). |
|---|