Supplementary material from "Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers"

The value of birds’ ability to move the upper beak relative to the braincase has been shown in vital tasks like feeding and singing. In woodpeckers, such cranial kinesis has been thought to hinder pecking as delivering forceful blows calls for a head functioning as a rigid unit. Here, we tested whet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyons, Sebastián, Baeckens, Simon, Van Wassenbergh, S.
Formato: Conjunto de datos
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/161134
Aporte de:
id I19-R120-10915-161134
record_format dspace
spelling I19-R120-10915-1611342023-12-06T04:06:39Z http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/161134 Supplementary material from "Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers" Lyons, Sebastián Baeckens, Simon Van Wassenbergh, S. 2023-12-05T17:39:28Z 2023 es Ciencias Naturales https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 Pájaros Zoología The value of birds’ ability to move the upper beak relative to the braincase has been shown in vital tasks like feeding and singing. In woodpeckers, such cranial kinesis has been thought to hinder pecking as delivering forceful blows calls for a head functioning as a rigid unit. Here, we tested whether cranial kinesis is constrained in woodpeckers by comparing upper beak rotation during their daily activities such as food handling, calling and gaping with those from closely related species that also have a largely insectivorous diet but do not peck at wood. Both woodpeckers and non-woodpecker insectivores displayed upper beak rotations of up to 8 degrees. However, the direction of upper beak rotation differed significantly between the two groups, with woodpeckers displaying primarily depressions and non-woodpeckers displaying elevations. The divergent upper beak rotation of woodpeckers may be caused either by anatomical modifications to the craniofacial hinge that reduce elevation, by the caudal orientation of the mandible depressor muscle forcing beak depressions, or by both. Our results suggest that pecking does not result in plain rigidification at the upper beak's basis of woodpeckers, but it nevertheless significantly influences the way cranial kinesis is manifested. Este conjunto de datos es el material suplementario del artículo citado, al que puede accederse en "Documentos relacionados". Fil: Lyons, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo; Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo Conjunto de datos Conjunto de datos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) video/mp4
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Español
topic Ciencias Naturales
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
Pájaros
Zoología
spellingShingle Ciencias Naturales
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
Pájaros
Zoología
Lyons, Sebastián
Baeckens, Simon
Van Wassenbergh, S.
Supplementary material from "Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers"
topic_facet Ciencias Naturales
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
Pájaros
Zoología
description The value of birds’ ability to move the upper beak relative to the braincase has been shown in vital tasks like feeding and singing. In woodpeckers, such cranial kinesis has been thought to hinder pecking as delivering forceful blows calls for a head functioning as a rigid unit. Here, we tested whether cranial kinesis is constrained in woodpeckers by comparing upper beak rotation during their daily activities such as food handling, calling and gaping with those from closely related species that also have a largely insectivorous diet but do not peck at wood. Both woodpeckers and non-woodpecker insectivores displayed upper beak rotations of up to 8 degrees. However, the direction of upper beak rotation differed significantly between the two groups, with woodpeckers displaying primarily depressions and non-woodpeckers displaying elevations. The divergent upper beak rotation of woodpeckers may be caused either by anatomical modifications to the craniofacial hinge that reduce elevation, by the caudal orientation of the mandible depressor muscle forcing beak depressions, or by both. Our results suggest that pecking does not result in plain rigidification at the upper beak's basis of woodpeckers, but it nevertheless significantly influences the way cranial kinesis is manifested.
format Conjunto de datos
Conjunto de datos
author Lyons, Sebastián
Baeckens, Simon
Van Wassenbergh, S.
author_facet Lyons, Sebastián
Baeckens, Simon
Van Wassenbergh, S.
author_sort Lyons, Sebastián
title Supplementary material from "Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers"
title_short Supplementary material from "Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers"
title_full Supplementary material from "Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers"
title_fullStr Supplementary material from "Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers"
title_full_unstemmed Supplementary material from "Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers"
title_sort supplementary material from "upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers"
publishDate 2023
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/161134
work_keys_str_mv AT lyonssebastian supplementarymaterialfromupperbeakdepressioninsteadofelevationdominatescranialkinesisinwoodpeckers
AT baeckenssimon supplementarymaterialfromupperbeakdepressioninsteadofelevationdominatescranialkinesisinwoodpeckers
AT vanwassenberghs supplementarymaterialfromupperbeakdepressioninsteadofelevationdominatescranialkinesisinwoodpeckers
_version_ 1807222065817714688