Social choice situations and aggregation criteria: inductive reasoning in social shoice theory

The usual procedure in Social Choice Theory consists in postulating some desirable properties which a aggregation procedure should verify and from them to derive the features of the corresponding social choice function and the outcomes that arise at each possible profile of preferences. In this pape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tohmé, Fernando Abel, Auday, Marcelo
Formato: Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2005
Materias:
Ciencias Económicas
Social Choice
Aggregation
Model Theory
Axiomatization
Elección Social
Agregación
Teoría de Modelos
Axiomatización
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/164837
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-164837
record_format dspace
spelling I19-R120-10915-1648372024-04-15T20:02:30Z http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/164837 Social choice situations and aggregation criteria: inductive reasoning in social shoice theory Tohmé, Fernando Abel Auday, Marcelo 2005-11 2005 2024-04-15T17:20:39Z en Ciencias Económicas Social Choice Aggregation Model Theory Axiomatization Elección Social Agregación Teoría de Modelos Axiomatización The usual procedure in Social Choice Theory consists in postulating some desirable properties which a aggregation procedure should verify and from them to derive the features of the corresponding social choice function and the outcomes that arise at each possible profile of preferences. In this paper we invert this line of reasoning and try to infer, up from what we call social situations (each one consisting of a profile and the associated social ordering) the criteria verified in the implicit aggregation procedure. Furthermore we derive them in axiomatic form. This inference process, which extracts intentional from extensional information can be seen as an exercise in social choice-theoretic “statistics”. The fact that complete intentional characterizations of the aggregation process cannot be derived in such way can be easily seen as a consequence of the procedure. El procedimiento usual en la Teoría de la Elección Social consiste en postular algunas propiedades que se desea que un proceso de agregación verifique y de ellas derivar las características de la función de agregación social y los resultados que surgen de aplicarla en cada posible vector de preferencias. En este trabajo invertimos esta línea de razonamiento y tratamos de inferir, a partir de lo que llamamos situaciones sociales (cada una consistente de un vector de preferencias y del ordenamiento social asociado), los criterios verificados en el proceso de agregación implícito. Más aún, los derivamos en forma axiomática. Este proceso de inferencia, que extrae información intensional a partir de la extensional puede ser visto como un ejercicio en “estadística” de la elección social. El hecho de caracterizaciones intensionales completas no pueden ser derivadas en esta forma puede ser fácilmente visto como una consecuencia del procedimiento Facultad de Ciencias Económicas Objeto de conferencia Objeto de conferencia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Económicas
Social Choice
Aggregation
Model Theory
Axiomatization
Elección Social
Agregación
Teoría de Modelos
Axiomatización
spellingShingle Ciencias Económicas
Social Choice
Aggregation
Model Theory
Axiomatization
Elección Social
Agregación
Teoría de Modelos
Axiomatización
Tohmé, Fernando Abel
Auday, Marcelo
Social choice situations and aggregation criteria: inductive reasoning in social shoice theory
topic_facet Ciencias Económicas
Social Choice
Aggregation
Model Theory
Axiomatization
Elección Social
Agregación
Teoría de Modelos
Axiomatización
description The usual procedure in Social Choice Theory consists in postulating some desirable properties which a aggregation procedure should verify and from them to derive the features of the corresponding social choice function and the outcomes that arise at each possible profile of preferences. In this paper we invert this line of reasoning and try to infer, up from what we call social situations (each one consisting of a profile and the associated social ordering) the criteria verified in the implicit aggregation procedure. Furthermore we derive them in axiomatic form. This inference process, which extracts intentional from extensional information can be seen as an exercise in social choice-theoretic “statistics”. The fact that complete intentional characterizations of the aggregation process cannot be derived in such way can be easily seen as a consequence of the procedure.
format Objeto de conferencia
Objeto de conferencia
author Tohmé, Fernando Abel
Auday, Marcelo
author_facet Tohmé, Fernando Abel
Auday, Marcelo
author_sort Tohmé, Fernando Abel
title Social choice situations and aggregation criteria: inductive reasoning in social shoice theory
title_short Social choice situations and aggregation criteria: inductive reasoning in social shoice theory
title_full Social choice situations and aggregation criteria: inductive reasoning in social shoice theory
title_fullStr Social choice situations and aggregation criteria: inductive reasoning in social shoice theory
title_full_unstemmed Social choice situations and aggregation criteria: inductive reasoning in social shoice theory
title_sort social choice situations and aggregation criteria: inductive reasoning in social shoice theory
publishDate 2005
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/164837
work_keys_str_mv AT tohmefernandoabel socialchoicesituationsandaggregationcriteriainductivereasoninginsocialshoicetheory
AT audaymarcelo socialchoicesituationsandaggregationcriteriainductivereasoninginsocialshoicetheory
_version_ 1807222783659212800

Ejemplares similares