Predictive efficacy of violence risk assessment instruments in Latin-America

In Latin America, violence risk assessment used to be based in the non-structured clinical approach. An Argentinian cohort study that included violence risk assessment tools changed the tradition. The objective of this study is to inform of the observed predictive efficacy of these tools in the foll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Folino, Jorge Oscar
Formato: Articulo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/86614
Aporte de:
id I19-R120-10915-86614
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Psicología
Psiquiatría
Violence
Risk assessment
Risk scale
Predictive validity
Offender population
Violencia
Evaluación de riesgo
Escala de riesgo
Validez predictiva
Población prisionera
spellingShingle Psicología
Psiquiatría
Violence
Risk assessment
Risk scale
Predictive validity
Offender population
Violencia
Evaluación de riesgo
Escala de riesgo
Validez predictiva
Población prisionera
Folino, Jorge Oscar
Predictive efficacy of violence risk assessment instruments in Latin-America
topic_facet Psicología
Psiquiatría
Violence
Risk assessment
Risk scale
Predictive validity
Offender population
Violencia
Evaluación de riesgo
Escala de riesgo
Validez predictiva
Población prisionera
description In Latin America, violence risk assessment used to be based in the non-structured clinical approach. An Argentinian cohort study that included violence risk assessment tools changed the tradition. The objective of this study is to inform of the observed predictive efficacy of these tools in the follow-up until March 2012. One hundred and fifty three consecutive pre-released convicted males were recruited from September 2001 through September 2004 in La Plata, Argentina. The pre-release assessment measures included the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, Assessing Risk for Violence V2, Structured Professional Judgment, and Violence Risk Appraisal Guide. The mean follow-up time was 1,290 days. Ninety-nine (64.7%) subjects had at least one general relapse, and 91 (59.5%) had at least one violent relapse. The incidence rate of violent recidivism was 16.8 per 100 person-years. While some indicators of predictive validity had no clinical significance, the time-dependent indicators did have clinical significance.
format Articulo
Articulo
author Folino, Jorge Oscar
author_facet Folino, Jorge Oscar
author_sort Folino, Jorge Oscar
title Predictive efficacy of violence risk assessment instruments in Latin-America
title_short Predictive efficacy of violence risk assessment instruments in Latin-America
title_full Predictive efficacy of violence risk assessment instruments in Latin-America
title_fullStr Predictive efficacy of violence risk assessment instruments in Latin-America
title_full_unstemmed Predictive efficacy of violence risk assessment instruments in Latin-America
title_sort predictive efficacy of violence risk assessment instruments in latin-america
publishDate 2015
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/86614
work_keys_str_mv AT folinojorgeoscar predictiveefficacyofviolenceriskassessmentinstrumentsinlatinamerica
AT folinojorgeoscar eficaciapredictoradelosinstrumentosdeevaluaciondelriesgodeviolenciaenlatinoamerica
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820489852682241