Mimetic Plato: Socrates’ ethopoeia and philosophical knowledge
In the framework of the current studies of theory and practice of μίμησις in Rep.of Plato, the objective is to investigate the Platonic characterization [ἠθοποιία] ofSocrates. The hypothesis is that the option for dialogue is linked to the way ofunderstanding and transmitting philosophical knowledge...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Asociación Argentina de Estudios Clásicos (AADEC) - Ediciones UNL
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/index/article/view/14119 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I26-R133-article-14119 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I26-R133-article-141192025-06-10T20:52:00Z Mimetic Plato: Socrates’ ethopoeia and philosophical knowledge Platón mimético: la etopeya de Sócrates y el saber filosófico Veccio, Ariel Mimesis Platón Narratología Progymnásmata Filosofía Mimesis Plato Narratology Progymnásmata Philosophy In the framework of the current studies of theory and practice of μίμησις in Rep.of Plato, the objective is to investigate the Platonic characterization [ἠθοποιία] ofSocrates. The hypothesis is that the option for dialogue is linked to the way ofunderstanding and transmitting philosophical knowledge and that, in thisframework, the figure of the character Socrates embodies a type of know-how.For this purpose, on the one hand, the characterization in the Progymnásmata isinvestigated to show its function and the place that Plato occupies in this tradition.On the other hand, key passages from Apology and Republic I are analyzed toshed light on the narrative composition and, through it, try to account for thephilosophical task in the Socratic characterization. For the latter, we present thedistinction between Ryle and Polanyi's know that and know how. En el marco de los estudios actuales de teoría y práctica de μίμησις en Rep. dePlatón, el objetivo es indagar la caracterización [ἠθοποιία] platónica de Sócrates.La hipótesis es que la opción por el diálogo está ligada al modo de comprender yde transmitir el saber filosófico y que, en tal marco, la figura del personaje Sócratesencarna un tipo de saber hacer. Para tal fin, por un lado, se indaga lacaracterización en los Progymnásmata para mostrar su función y el lugar queocupa Platón en esta tradición. Por otro lado, se analizan pasajes clave de Apologíay República I para echar luz sobre la composición narrativa y, a través de ella,intentar dar cuenta del quehacer filosófico en la caracterización socrática. Para estoúltimo, presentamos la distinción entre know that y know how de Ryle y Polanyi. Asociación Argentina de Estudios Clásicos (AADEC) - Ediciones UNL 2024-12-18 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article application/pdf https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/index/article/view/14119 10.14409/argos.2024.51.e0065 Argos; n. 51 (2024): Argos; e0065 Argos; No. 51 (2024): Argos; e0065 Argos; Núm. 51 (2024): Argos; e0065 1853-6379 0325-4194 10.14409/argos.2024.51 es https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/index/article/view/14119/19957 Derechos de autor 2024 Argos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
| institution_str |
I-26 |
| repository_str |
R-133 |
| container_title_str |
Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL) |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Mimesis Platón Narratología Progymnásmata Filosofía Mimesis Plato Narratology Progymnásmata Philosophy |
| spellingShingle |
Mimesis Platón Narratología Progymnásmata Filosofía Mimesis Plato Narratology Progymnásmata Philosophy Veccio, Ariel Mimetic Plato: Socrates’ ethopoeia and philosophical knowledge |
| topic_facet |
Mimesis Platón Narratología Progymnásmata Filosofía Mimesis Plato Narratology Progymnásmata Philosophy |
| author |
Veccio, Ariel |
| author_facet |
Veccio, Ariel |
| author_sort |
Veccio, Ariel |
| title |
Mimetic Plato: Socrates’ ethopoeia and philosophical knowledge |
| title_short |
Mimetic Plato: Socrates’ ethopoeia and philosophical knowledge |
| title_full |
Mimetic Plato: Socrates’ ethopoeia and philosophical knowledge |
| title_fullStr |
Mimetic Plato: Socrates’ ethopoeia and philosophical knowledge |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Mimetic Plato: Socrates’ ethopoeia and philosophical knowledge |
| title_sort |
mimetic plato: socrates’ ethopoeia and philosophical knowledge |
| description |
In the framework of the current studies of theory and practice of μίμησις in Rep.of Plato, the objective is to investigate the Platonic characterization [ἠθοποιία] ofSocrates. The hypothesis is that the option for dialogue is linked to the way ofunderstanding and transmitting philosophical knowledge and that, in thisframework, the figure of the character Socrates embodies a type of know-how.For this purpose, on the one hand, the characterization in the Progymnásmata isinvestigated to show its function and the place that Plato occupies in this tradition.On the other hand, key passages from Apology and Republic I are analyzed toshed light on the narrative composition and, through it, try to account for thephilosophical task in the Socratic characterization. For the latter, we present thedistinction between Ryle and Polanyi's know that and know how. |
| publisher |
Asociación Argentina de Estudios Clásicos (AADEC) - Ediciones UNL |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| url |
https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/index/article/view/14119 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT veccioariel mimeticplatosocratesethopoeiaandphilosophicalknowledge AT veccioariel platonmimeticolaetopeyadesocratesyelsaberfilosofico |
| first_indexed |
2025-02-05T23:07:08Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-09-15T05:02:04Z |
| _version_ |
1843304882820349952 |