Recreating research in a conjunctural context. Redesigns and methodological transitions
This article presents contributions from a methodological perspective in two distinct studies and moments. On one hand, it focuses on the study for the Master’s thesis in University Teaching at the University of Buenos Aires, conducted between 2020 and 2021 in Buenos Aires, Argentina (Suárez Torrico...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Subsecretaría de publicaciones. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. UBA
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/iice/article/view/14843 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=reviice&d=14843_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This article presents contributions from a methodological perspective in two distinct studies and moments. On one hand, it focuses on the study for the Master’s thesis in University Teaching at the University of Buenos Aires, conducted between 2020 and 2021 in Buenos Aires, Argentina (Suárez Torrico, 2022). The research was shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic context, and this paper explores the successive recreations of the methodological framework in this situation. It discusses the stages, decisions, and redesigns that were undertaken to continue and complete the research in a time of exceptional circumstances. On the other hand, the article also addresses the transition and methodological design for a study framed within a doctoral thesis in Educational Sciences at the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters of the University of Buenos Aires, which is currently in progress in Buenos Aires, Argentina. This methodological transition positions the current research in a post-pandemic context and redesigns in the teaching proposals within the workshop setting at the Faculty of Architecture, Design, and Urbanism of the University of Buenos Aires. Given the significance of the studies that took place during the pivotal moments recognized here —the pandemic and its aftermath— and their contributions to a hybrid and post-pandemic scenario, this work aims to contribute to the discussion of the transformation of research processes and their designs in increasingly complex and opportunistic settings. |
|---|