La reciprocidad y el don no son la misma cosa
The aim of this text is to show how the notion of ‘reciprocity’, although have been considered a synonymous of gift exchange, veils different social situations. A brief survey of the history of the use of the word shows how ‘reciprocity’, from Durkheim to Polanyi, seems as a palimpsest of various no...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UBA
2007
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CAS/article/view/4369 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=cantropo&d=4369_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The aim of this text is to show how the notion of ‘reciprocity’, although have been considered a synonymous of gift exchange, veils different social situations. A brief survey of the history of the use of the word shows how ‘reciprocity’, from Durkheim to Polanyi, seems as a palimpsest of various notions. Although, he essays a defense of a concept of ‘gift’ related to the Maussian texts, and closer to some issues of recent ethnography and social theory. He distinguishes two types of gifts paths: closed, where final consumption goods circulates, and open ones, where we find not-consumption goods, which resume the whole of social relationship. |
|---|