El Estoppel : dificultades para definir una regla en derecho internacional y el rol deslucido de la Corte Internacional de Justicia
Born as an institute of common law, estoppel was introduced in\nInternational Law through the awards of British and American umpires in the 19th\nand 20th centuries. Later on picked up ?implicitly or explicitly? by the PCIJ and the\nICJ (Serbian Loans, Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, Fisheries, a...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/91/el-estoppel-dificultades-para-definir-una-regla-en-derecho-internacional-y-el-rol-deslucido-de-la-corte-internacional-de-justicia.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_933 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_933.dir/933.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Born as an institute of common law, estoppel was introduced in\nInternational Law through the awards of British and American umpires in the 19th\nand 20th centuries. Later on picked up ?implicitly or explicitly? by the PCIJ and the\nICJ (Serbian Loans, Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, Fisheries, and Northern Sea\nContinental Shelf, amongst others), it has become a peremptory objection frequently\nasserted. However, the International Court does not seem to have been able to specify\nits constituents, thus leading to an inconsistent interpretation of both silence and the\nso-called detrimental reliance as well. The resultant uncertainty brings doubts as to the\nvery existence of estoppel as a rule of International Law. |
|---|