Reply to "comments on the quantum theory of valence and bonding: Choosing between alternative definitions"
In this Reply, to the preceding, Comment of Mayer, we indicate that there is no reason to prefer Mayer's definitions to ours (or conversely) when in the usual range of validity. © 1984.
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | JOUR |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00092614_v110_n4_p445_Natiello |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In this Reply, to the preceding, Comment of Mayer, we indicate that there is no reason to prefer Mayer's definitions to ours (or conversely) when in the usual range of validity. © 1984. |
|---|