A note on equivalence of means
Given a real interval I, a relation, denoted by '∼', is defined on the set of means on I x I by setting M ∼ N when there exists a surjective continuous function f solving the functional equation f(M(x,y)) = N(f (x),f(y)), x,y ∈ I . A surjective and continuous solution to this equation turn...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | JOUR |
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00333883_v58_n1_p49_Berrone |
Aporte de: |
Sumario: | Given a real interval I, a relation, denoted by '∼', is defined on the set of means on I x I by setting M ∼ N when there exists a surjective continuous function f solving the functional equation f(M(x,y)) = N(f (x),f(y)), x,y ∈ I . A surjective and continuous solution to this equation turns out to be injective and so, '∼' is an equivalence. This fact seems to be not properly noticed in the literature on means. |
---|