Contribution of reserves to kernel weight and grain yield determination in maize phenotypic and genotypic variation
Maize (Zea mays L.) kernel weight (KW) and grain yield depend on plant growth during active grain filling and reserves use. The objective of our study was to analyze the phenotypic and genotypic variation in these traits in a family of recombinant inbred lines (RIL). In two field experiments we meas...
Guardado en:
| Otros Autores: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2016dandrea.pdf LINK AL EDITOR |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 04425cab a22004097a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 20181023143726.0 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUFA | ||
| 005 | 20240226095913.0 | ||
| 008 | 181023t2016 xxud||||o|||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 999 | |c 45971 |d 45971 | ||
| 999 | |d 45971 | ||
| 999 | |d 45971 | ||
| 999 | |d 45971 | ||
| 999 | |d 45971 | ||
| 999 | |d 45971 | ||
| 022 | |a 0011-183X | ||
| 024 | |a 10.2135/cropsci2015.05.0295 | ||
| 040 | |a AR-BaUFA |c AR-BaUFA | ||
| 245 | 1 | |a Contribution of reserves to kernel weight and grain yield determination in maize |b phenotypic and genotypic variation | |
| 520 | |a Maize (Zea mays L.) kernel weight (KW) and grain yield depend on plant growth during active grain filling and reserves use. The objective of our study was to analyze the phenotypic and genotypic variation in these traits in a family of recombinant inbred lines (RIL). In two field experiments we measured plant grain yield (PGY) and its components (KW and kernel number per plant, KNP), biomass production per plant and per kernel during active grain filling, and apparent reserves use (ARU) per plant (ARUP, difference between PGY and plant biomass production during active grain filling) and per kernel (ARUK, difference between KW and plant biomass production per kernel during active grain filling). Heritability (h2) and phenotypic plasticity were computed for all traits. Large differences were always evident among genotypes, but phenotypic plasticity was (i) low for KW and plant biomass at R2 and physiological maturity; (ii) intermediate for KNP and PGY; and (iii) high for plant growth, plant growth per kernel after R2, and ARUs. Traits with highest h2 were KW (0.70), KNP (0.61), and ARUP (0.59). Final KW was related to plant growth per kernel (r2 = 0.64; P menor a 0.001) but not to ARUK, and ARUP was driven (r2 0.49; P menor a 0.001) by KNP. Because of its positive relationship with KNP (main determinant of PGY), high h2 and high phenotypic plasticity, breeding must consider the increase in ARUP for improving grain yield, an objective that needs to be coupled with large reserves accumulation before silking to avoid the risk of lodging. | ||
| 650 | |2 Agrovoc |9 26 | ||
| 653 | |a CORN | ||
| 653 | |a HYBRIDS | ||
| 653 | |a KERNEL WEIGHT | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a D'Andrea, Karina Elizabeth |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |9 11924 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Piedra, Carlina Victoria |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. |9 32800 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mandolino, Cecilia I. |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. |9 67856 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bender, Ross |u University of Illinois. Department of Crop Sciences. Illinois, USA. |9 67999 | |
| 700 | |a Cerri, Ana María |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |9 24777 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |9 5928 |a Cirilo, Alfredo Gabriel |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Otegui, María Elena |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. |9 5930 | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Crop science |w SECS000064 |g Vol.56, no.2 (2016), p.697–706, tbls. | |
| 856 | |f 2016dandrea |i En reservorio: |q application/pdf |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2016dandrea.pdf |x ARTI201810 | ||
| 856 | |u http://www.crops.org |z LINK AL EDITOR | ||
| 942 | |c ARTICULO | ||
| 942 | |c ENLINEA | ||
| 976 | |a AAG | ||