Global patterns of rainfall partitioning by invasive woody plants

Aim: Invasive species have the potential to alter hydrological processes by changing the local water balance. However, general patterns of how rainfall is partitioned into interception, throughfall and stemflow for invasive species worldwide have been seldom explored. We (a) describe the percentage...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Whitworth Hulse, Juan I., Magliano, Patricio Nicolás, Zeballos, Sebastián R., Aguiar, Sebastián, Baldi, Germán
Formato: Manuscrito Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2021whitworthhulse.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 05337ctb a22004217a 4500
001 20221019123219.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20230918124454.0
008 221019t2021 xxuabd||o|||| 00| 0 eng d
999 |c 55027  |d 55027 
999 |d 55027 
999 |d 55027 
999 |d 55027 
999 |d 55027 
022 |a 1466-822X (impreso) 
022 |a 1466-8238 (en línea) 
024 |a 10.1111/geb.13218 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Global patterns of rainfall partitioning by invasive woody plants 
520 |a Aim: Invasive species have the potential to alter hydrological processes by changing the local water balance. However, general patterns of how rainfall is partitioned into interception, throughfall and stemflow for invasive species worldwide have been seldom explored. We (a) describe the percentage of interception, throughfall and stemflow for invasive woody plant species; (b) analyse the influence of morphological attributes (i.e. life-form, bark roughness, leaf type, leaf phenology and leaf area index) of invasive species on rainfall partitioning; and (c) compare the rainfall partitioning fluxes for co-occurring invasive and native species, testing whether the variation in these fluxes depends on water availability of the study location. Location: Global. Time period: Present. Major taxa studied: Plants. Methods: We compiled data of 100 studies that assessed rainfall partitioning by invasive species (n = 67) and registered their morphological attributes. By means of a meta-analysis we compared the rainfall partitioning by native and invasive species (n = 47 comparisons) and assessed how their fluxes were affected by water availability. Results: Interception, throughfall and stemflow ranged from 1.6–59.5, 39.1–92.7 and 0.1–31.6% of total rainfall, respectively. The bark roughness and leaf type were the most important attributes driving rainfall partitioning fluxes. While rough-barked species constrain rainfall inputs by promoting higher losses due to interception, smooth-barked species with broad leaves enhance the amount of rainwater reaching the soil by maximizing stemflow. For pairwise comparisons, invasive species have higher stemflow values than native species for both drylands and humid areas, and higher throughfall in drylands, but less in humid areas. Main conclusions: Our findings suggest that specific morphological attributes of invasive species determine higher localized water inputs, which may represent an ecohydrological advantage, particularly in water-limited ecosystems. These insights also suggest that the ecological role of stemflow, throughfall and interception should be considered in future plant invasions research. 
650 |2 Agrovoc  |9 26 
653 |a ARIDITY 
653 |a BIOLOGICAL INVASION 
653 |a ECOHYDROLOGY 
653 |a META-ANALYSIS 
653 |a STEMFLOW 
653 |a WOODY PLANTS 
700 1 |a Whitworth Hulse, Juan I.  |u Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis (IMASL). San Luis, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis (IMASL). San Luis, Argentina.  |u Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV). Córdoba, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV). Córdoba, Argentina.  |9 74121 
700 1 |a Magliano, Patricio Nicolás  |u Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis (IMASL). San Luis, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis (IMASL). San Luis, Argentina.  |u Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia. Departamento de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas. San Luis, Argentina.  |9 31084 
700 1 |a Zeballos, Sebastián R.  |u Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV). Córdoba, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV). Córdoba, Argentina.  |9 74122 
700 1 |9 35890  |a Aguiar, Sebastián  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |a Baldi, Germán  |u Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis (IMASL). San Luis, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis (IMASL). San Luis, Argentina.  |9 26877 
773 |t Global Ecology and Biogeography  |g Vol.30, no.1 (2021), p.235–246, il., tbls., grafs., mapas 
856 |f 2021whitworthhulse  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2021whitworthhulse.pdf  |x ARTI202210 
856 |u https://www.wiley.com/  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG