Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits
Sustainable agricultural landscapes by definition provide high magnitude and stability of ecosystem services, biodiversity and crop productivity. However, few studies have considered landscape effects on the stability of ecosystem services. We tested whether isolation from florally diverse natural a...
Guardado en:
| Otros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Garibaldi2.pdf LINK AL EDITOR |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 12463cab a22025817a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | AR-BaUFA000134 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUFA | ||
| 005 | 20220503133328.0 | ||
| 008 | 181208t2011 |||||o|||||00||||spa d | ||
| 999 | |c 46568 |d 46568 | ||
| 022 | |a 1461-023X | ||
| 024 | |a 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x | ||
| 040 | |a AR-BaUFA |c AR-BaUFA | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits |
| 520 | |a Sustainable agricultural landscapes by definition provide high magnitude and stability of ecosystem services, biodiversity and crop productivity. However, few studies have considered landscape effects on the stability of ecosystem services. We tested whether isolation from florally diverse natural and semi-natural areas reduces the spatial and temporal stability of flower-visitor richness and pollination services in crop fields. We synthesised data from 29 studies with contrasting biomes, crop species and pollinator communities. Stability of flower-visitor richness, visitation rate [all insects except honey bees] and fruit set all decreased with distance from natural areas. At 1km from adjacent natural areas, spatial stability decreased by 25, 16 and 9 percent for richness, visitation and fruit set, respectively, while temporal stability decreased by 39 percent for richness and 13 percent for visitation. Mean richness, visitation and fruit set also decreased with isolation, by 34, 27 and 16 percent at 1km respectively. In contrast, honey bee visitation did not change with isolation and represented less than 25 percent of crop visits in 21 studies. Therefore, wild pollinators are relevant for crop productivity and stability even when honey bees are abundant. Policies to preserve and restore natural areas in agricultural landscapes should enhance levels and reliability of pollination services. | ||
| 653 | 0 | |a APIS MELLIFERA | |
| 653 | 0 | |a BOMBUS SPP. | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICES | |
| 653 | 0 | |a FLOWER VISITORS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT | |
| 653 | 0 | |a POLLINATOR SERVICES | |
| 653 | 0 | |a RICHNESS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SPATIAL STABILITY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES | |
| 653 | 0 | |a TEMPORAL STABILITY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a AGRICULTURAL LAND | |
| 653 | 0 | |a APICULTURE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a BIODIVERSITY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a BIOME | |
| 653 | 0 | |a CROP PRODUCTION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a DATA SET | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a FLOWER VISITING | |
| 653 | 0 | |a FRUIT SET | |
| 653 | 0 | |a HONEYBEE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ISOLATED POPULATION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a LANDSCAPE PLANNING | |
| 653 | 0 | |a POLLINATION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a POLLINATOR | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PRISTINE ENVIRONMENT | |
| 653 | 0 | |a RESTORATION ECOLOGY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SUSTAINABILITY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a AGRICULTURE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ECOSYSTEM | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PHYSIOLOGY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ANIMALS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a BEES | |
| 653 | 0 | |a BIODIVERSITY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a HEXAPODA | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 31177 |a Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Steffan Dewente, Ingolf |9 69588 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kremen, Claire |9 69589 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morales, Juan M. |9 69590 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bommarco, Riccardo |9 69591 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cunningham, S. A. |9 69460 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Carvalheiro, Luisa G. |9 69592 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chacoff, Natacha P. |9 69593 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dudenhöffer, Jan H. |9 69594 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Greenleaf, Sarah S. |9 69595 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Holzschuh, Andrea |9 69596 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Isaacs, Rufus |9 69597 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Krewenka, Kristin |9 69598 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mandelik, Yael |9 69599 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mayfield, Margaret M. |9 69600 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morandin, Lora A. |9 69601 | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 69602 |a Potts, Simon G. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ricketts, Taylor H. |9 69603 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Szentgyörgyi, Hajnalka |9 69604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Viana, Blandina F. |9 69605 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Westphal, Catrin |9 69606 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Winfree, Rachael |9 69607 | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 69459 |a Klein, Alexandra M. | |
| 773 | |t Ecology Letters |g Vol.14, no.10 (2011), p.1062-1072 | ||
| 856 | |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Garibaldi2.pdf |i En reservorio |q application/pdf |f 2011Garibaldi2 |x MIGRADOS2018 | ||
| 856 | |u http://www.wiley.com/ |x MIGRADOS2018 |z LINK AL EDITOR | ||
| 900 | |a as | ||
| 900 | |a 20131220 | ||
| 900 | |a N | ||
| 900 | |a SCOPUS | ||
| 900 | |a a | ||
| 900 | |a s | ||
| 900 | |a ARTICULO | ||
| 900 | |a EN LINEA | ||
| 900 | |a 1461023X | ||
| 900 | |a 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x | ||
| 900 | |a ^tStability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits | ||
| 900 | |a ^aGaribaldi^bL.A. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aSteffan-Dewenter^bI. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aKremen^bC. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMorales^bJ.M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aBommarco^bR. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCunningham^bS.A. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCarvalheiro^bL.G. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aChacoff^bN.P. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aDudenhöffer^bJ.H. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aGreenleaf^bS.S. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aHolzschuh^bA. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aIsaacs^bR. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aKrewenka^bK. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMandelik^bY. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMayfield^bM.M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMorandin^bL.A. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aPotts^bS.G. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aRicketts^bT.H. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aSzentgyörgyi^bH. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aViana^bB.F. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aWestphal^bC. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aWinfree^bR. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aKlein^bA.M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aGaribaldi^bL. A. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aSteffan Dewenter^bI. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aKremen^bC. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMorales^bJ. M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aBommarco^bR. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCunningham^bS. A. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCarvalheiro^bL. G. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aChacoff^bN. P. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aDudenhöffer^bJ. H. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aGreenleaf^bS. S. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aHolzschuh^bA. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aIsaacs^bR. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aKrewenka^bK. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMandelik^bY. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMayfield^bM. M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMorandin^bL. A. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aPotts^bS. G. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aRicketts^bT. H. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aSzentgyörgyi^bH. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aViana^bB. F. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aWestphal^bC. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aWinfree^bR. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aKlein^bA. M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aGaribaldi^bL.A.^tLaboratorio de Ecotono, INIBIOMA-CONICET and CRUB-UNCOMA, Quintral 1250, 8400 Bariloche, RÃo Negro, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aSteffan-Dewenter^bI.^tDepartamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de AgronomÃa, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San MartÃn 4453, 1417 Buenos Aires, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aKremen^bC.^tDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, University of Würzburg, Biozentrum, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMorales^bJ.M.^tDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, United States | ||
| 900 | |a ^aBommarco^bR.^tDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7044, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCunningham^bS.A.^tCSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCarvalheiro^bL.G.^tSouth African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, South Africa | ||
| 900 | |a ^aChacoff^bN.P.^tDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa | ||
| 900 | |a ^aDudenhöffer^bJ.H.^tInstitute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom | ||
| 900 | |a ^aGreenleaf^bS.S.^tNCB-Naturalis, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA, Leiden, Netherlands | ||
| 900 | |a ^aHolzschuh^bA.^tInstituto de Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Aridas, CCT CONICET Mendoza, CC 507, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aIsaacs^bR.^tAgroecology, Georg August University Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany | ||
| 900 | |a ^aKrewenka^bK.^tDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMandelik^bY.^tDepartment of Entomology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, PO Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMayfield^bM.M.^tThe University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Goddard Building, St Lucia Campus, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMorandin^bL.A.^tCentre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, RG6 6AR, United Kingdom | ||
| 900 | |a ^aPotts^bS.G.^tConservation Science Program, WWF, Washington D.C., United States | ||
| 900 | |a ^aRicketts^bT.H.^tInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Ul. Gronostajowa 7, 30-387, Kraków, Poland | ||
| 900 | |a ^aSzentgyörgyi^bH.^tInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 40170-210, Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil | ||
| 900 | |a ^aViana^bB.F.^tDepartment of Entomology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States | ||
| 900 | |a ^aWestphal^bC.^tInstitute of Ecology, Section Ecosystem Functions, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, ScharnhorststraÃYe 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany | ||
| 900 | |a ^aWinfree^bR. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aKlein^bA.M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^tEcology Letters^cEcol. Lett. | ||
| 900 | |a eng | ||
| 900 | |a 1062 | ||
| 900 | |a ^i | ||
| 900 | |a Vol. 14, no. 10 | ||
| 900 | |a 1072 | ||
| 900 | |a APIS MELLIFERA | ||
| 900 | |a BOMBUS SPP. | ||
| 900 | |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICES | ||
| 900 | |a FLOWER VISITORS | ||
| 900 | |a LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT | ||
| 900 | |a POLLINATOR SERVICES | ||
| 900 | |a RICHNESS | ||
| 900 | |a SPATIAL STABILITY | ||
| 900 | |a SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES | ||
| 900 | |a TEMPORAL STABILITY | ||
| 900 | |a AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY | ||
| 900 | |a AGRICULTURAL LAND | ||
| 900 | |a APICULTURE | ||
| 900 | |a BIODIVERSITY | ||
| 900 | |a BIOME | ||
| 900 | |a CROP PRODUCTION | ||
| 900 | |a DATA SET | ||
| 900 | |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICE | ||
| 900 | |a FLOWER VISITING | ||
| 900 | |a FRUIT SET | ||
| 900 | |a HONEYBEE | ||
| 900 | |a ISOLATED POPULATION | ||
| 900 | |a LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY | ||
| 900 | |a LANDSCAPE PLANNING | ||
| 900 | |a POLLINATION | ||
| 900 | |a POLLINATOR | ||
| 900 | |a PRISTINE ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 900 | |a RESTORATION ECOLOGY | ||
| 900 | |a SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS | ||
| 900 | |a SUSTAINABILITY | ||
| 900 | |a AGRICULTURE | ||
| 900 | |a ECOSYSTEM | ||
| 900 | |a PHYSIOLOGY | ||
| 900 | |a ANIMALS | ||
| 900 | |a BEES | ||
| 900 | |a BIODIVERSITY | ||
| 900 | |a HEXAPODA | ||
| 900 | |a Sustainable agricultural landscapes by definition provide high magnitude and stability of ecosystem services, biodiversity and crop productivity. However, few studies have considered landscape effects on the stability of ecosystem services. We tested whether isolation from florally diverse natural and semi-natural areas reduces the spatial and temporal stability of flower-visitor richness and pollination services in crop fields. We synthesised data from 29 studies with contrasting biomes, crop species and pollinator communities. Stability of flower-visitor richness, visitation rate [all insects except honey bees] and fruit set all decreased with distance from natural areas. At 1km from adjacent natural areas, spatial stability decreased by 25, 16 and 9 percent for richness, visitation and fruit set, respectively, while temporal stability decreased by 39 percent for richness and 13 percent for visitation. Mean richness, visitation and fruit set also decreased with isolation, by 34, 27 and 16 percent at 1km respectively. In contrast, honey bee visitation did not change with isolation and represented less than 25 percent of crop visits in 21 studies. Therefore, wild pollinators are relevant for crop productivity and stability even when honey bees are abundant. Policies to preserve and restore natural areas in agricultural landscapes should enhance levels and reliability of pollination services. | ||
| 900 | |a 14 | ||
| 900 | |a 10 | ||
| 900 | |a 2011 | ||
| 900 | |a ^cH | ||
| 900 | |a AAG | ||
| 900 | |a AGROVOC | ||
| 900 | |a 2011Garibaldi2 | ||
| 900 | |a AAG | ||
| 900 | |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Garibaldi2.pdf | ||
| 900 | |a 2011Garibaldi2.pdf | ||
| 900 | |a http://www.wiley.com/ | ||
| 900 | |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-80052800535&partnerID=40&md5=43f51bf0115381c30dddfa94bcd28863 | ||
| 900 | |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i | ||
| 900 | |a OS | ||
| 942 | 0 | 0 | |c ARTICULO |2 udc |
| 942 | 0 | 0 | |c ENLINEA |2 udc |