Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits

Sustainable agricultural landscapes by definition provide high magnitude and stability of ecosystem services, biodiversity and crop productivity. However, few studies have considered landscape effects on the stability of ecosystem services. We tested whether isolation from florally diverse natural a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro, Steffan Dewente, Ingolf, Kremen, Claire, Morales, Juan M., Bommarco, Riccardo, Cunningham, S. A., Carvalheiro, Luisa G., Chacoff, Natacha P., Dudenhöffer, Jan H., Greenleaf, Sarah S., Holzschuh, Andrea, Isaacs, Rufus, Krewenka, Kristin, Mandelik, Yael, Mayfield, Margaret M., Morandin, Lora A., Potts, Simon G., Ricketts, Taylor H., Szentgyörgyi, Hajnalka, Viana, Blandina F., Westphal, Catrin, Winfree, Rachael, Klein, Alexandra M.
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Español
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Garibaldi2.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 12463cab a22025817a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000134
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220503133328.0
008 181208t2011 |||||o|||||00||||spa d
999 |c 46568  |d 46568 
022 |a 1461-023X 
024 |a 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits 
520 |a Sustainable agricultural landscapes by definition provide high magnitude and stability of ecosystem services, biodiversity and crop productivity. However, few studies have considered landscape effects on the stability of ecosystem services. We tested whether isolation from florally diverse natural and semi-natural areas reduces the spatial and temporal stability of flower-visitor richness and pollination services in crop fields. We synthesised data from 29 studies with contrasting biomes, crop species and pollinator communities. Stability of flower-visitor richness, visitation rate [all insects except honey bees] and fruit set all decreased with distance from natural areas. At 1km from adjacent natural areas, spatial stability decreased by 25, 16 and 9 percent for richness, visitation and fruit set, respectively, while temporal stability decreased by 39 percent for richness and 13 percent for visitation. Mean richness, visitation and fruit set also decreased with isolation, by 34, 27 and 16 percent at 1km respectively. In contrast, honey bee visitation did not change with isolation and represented less than 25 percent of crop visits in 21 studies. Therefore, wild pollinators are relevant for crop productivity and stability even when honey bees are abundant. Policies to preserve and restore natural areas in agricultural landscapes should enhance levels and reliability of pollination services. 
653 0 |a APIS MELLIFERA 
653 0 |a BOMBUS SPP. 
653 0 |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 
653 0 |a FLOWER VISITORS 
653 0 |a LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT 
653 0 |a POLLINATOR SERVICES 
653 0 |a RICHNESS 
653 0 |a SPATIAL STABILITY 
653 0 |a SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES 
653 0 |a TEMPORAL STABILITY 
653 0 |a AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 
653 0 |a AGRICULTURAL LAND 
653 0 |a APICULTURE 
653 0 |a BIODIVERSITY 
653 0 |a BIOME 
653 0 |a CROP PRODUCTION 
653 0 |a DATA SET 
653 0 |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICE 
653 0 |a FLOWER VISITING 
653 0 |a FRUIT SET 
653 0 |a HONEYBEE 
653 0 |a ISOLATED POPULATION 
653 0 |a LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY 
653 0 |a LANDSCAPE PLANNING 
653 0 |a POLLINATION 
653 0 |a POLLINATOR 
653 0 |a PRISTINE ENVIRONMENT 
653 0 |a RESTORATION ECOLOGY 
653 0 |a SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS 
653 0 |a SUSTAINABILITY 
653 0 |a AGRICULTURE 
653 0 |a ECOSYSTEM 
653 0 |a PHYSIOLOGY 
653 0 |a ANIMALS 
653 0 |a BEES 
653 0 |a BIODIVERSITY 
653 0 |a HEXAPODA 
700 1 |9 31177  |a Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro 
700 1 |a Steffan Dewente, Ingolf  |9 69588 
700 1 |a Kremen, Claire  |9 69589 
700 1 |a Morales, Juan M.  |9 69590 
700 1 |a Bommarco, Riccardo  |9 69591 
700 1 |a Cunningham, S. A.  |9 69460 
700 1 |a Carvalheiro, Luisa G.  |9 69592 
700 1 |a Chacoff, Natacha P.   |9 69593 
700 1 |a Dudenhöffer, Jan H.  |9 69594 
700 1 |a Greenleaf, Sarah S.  |9 69595 
700 1 |a Holzschuh, Andrea  |9 69596 
700 1 |a Isaacs, Rufus  |9 69597 
700 1 |a Krewenka, Kristin  |9 69598 
700 1 |a Mandelik, Yael  |9 69599 
700 1 |a Mayfield, Margaret M.  |9 69600 
700 1 |a Morandin, Lora A.  |9 69601 
700 1 |9 69602  |a Potts, Simon G. 
700 1 |a Ricketts, Taylor H.  |9 69603 
700 1 |a Szentgyörgyi, Hajnalka  |9 69604 
700 1 |a Viana, Blandina F.  |9 69605 
700 1 |a Westphal, Catrin  |9 69606 
700 1 |a Winfree, Rachael  |9 69607 
700 1 |9 69459  |a Klein, Alexandra M. 
773 |t Ecology Letters  |g Vol.14, no.10 (2011), p.1062-1072 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Garibaldi2.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2011Garibaldi2  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://www.wiley.com/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
900 |a as 
900 |a 20131220 
900 |a N 
900 |a SCOPUS 
900 |a a 
900 |a s 
900 |a ARTICULO 
900 |a EN LINEA 
900 |a 1461023X 
900 |a 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x 
900 |a ^tStability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits 
900 |a ^aGaribaldi^bL.A. 
900 |a ^aSteffan-Dewenter^bI. 
900 |a ^aKremen^bC. 
900 |a ^aMorales^bJ.M. 
900 |a ^aBommarco^bR. 
900 |a ^aCunningham^bS.A. 
900 |a ^aCarvalheiro^bL.G. 
900 |a ^aChacoff^bN.P. 
900 |a ^aDudenhöffer^bJ.H. 
900 |a ^aGreenleaf^bS.S. 
900 |a ^aHolzschuh^bA. 
900 |a ^aIsaacs^bR. 
900 |a ^aKrewenka^bK. 
900 |a ^aMandelik^bY. 
900 |a ^aMayfield^bM.M. 
900 |a ^aMorandin^bL.A. 
900 |a ^aPotts^bS.G. 
900 |a ^aRicketts^bT.H. 
900 |a ^aSzentgyörgyi^bH. 
900 |a ^aViana^bB.F. 
900 |a ^aWestphal^bC. 
900 |a ^aWinfree^bR. 
900 |a ^aKlein^bA.M. 
900 |a ^aGaribaldi^bL. A. 
900 |a ^aSteffan Dewenter^bI. 
900 |a ^aKremen^bC. 
900 |a ^aMorales^bJ. M. 
900 |a ^aBommarco^bR. 
900 |a ^aCunningham^bS. A. 
900 |a ^aCarvalheiro^bL. G. 
900 |a ^aChacoff^bN. P. 
900 |a ^aDudenhöffer^bJ. H. 
900 |a ^aGreenleaf^bS. S. 
900 |a ^aHolzschuh^bA. 
900 |a ^aIsaacs^bR. 
900 |a ^aKrewenka^bK. 
900 |a ^aMandelik^bY. 
900 |a ^aMayfield^bM. M. 
900 |a ^aMorandin^bL. A. 
900 |a ^aPotts^bS. G. 
900 |a ^aRicketts^bT. H. 
900 |a ^aSzentgyörgyi^bH. 
900 |a ^aViana^bB. F. 
900 |a ^aWestphal^bC. 
900 |a ^aWinfree^bR. 
900 |a ^aKlein^bA. M. 
900 |a ^aGaribaldi^bL.A.^tLaboratorio de Ecotono, INIBIOMA-CONICET and CRUB-UNCOMA, Quintral 1250, 8400 Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina 
900 |a ^aSteffan-Dewenter^bI.^tDepartamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, 1417 Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aKremen^bC.^tDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, University of Würzburg, Biozentrum, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany 
900 |a ^aMorales^bJ.M.^tDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, United States 
900 |a ^aBommarco^bR.^tDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7044, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden 
900 |a ^aCunningham^bS.A.^tCSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia 
900 |a ^aCarvalheiro^bL.G.^tSouth African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, South Africa 
900 |a ^aChacoff^bN.P.^tDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa 
900 |a ^aDudenhöffer^bJ.H.^tInstitute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom 
900 |a ^aGreenleaf^bS.S.^tNCB-Naturalis, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA, Leiden, Netherlands 
900 |a ^aHolzschuh^bA.^tInstituto de Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Aridas, CCT CONICET Mendoza, CC 507, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina 
900 |a ^aIsaacs^bR.^tAgroecology, Georg August University Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany 
900 |a ^aKrewenka^bK.^tDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States 
900 |a ^aMandelik^bY.^tDepartment of Entomology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, PO Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel 
900 |a ^aMayfield^bM.M.^tThe University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Goddard Building, St Lucia Campus, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia 
900 |a ^aMorandin^bL.A.^tCentre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, RG6 6AR, United Kingdom 
900 |a ^aPotts^bS.G.^tConservation Science Program, WWF, Washington D.C., United States 
900 |a ^aRicketts^bT.H.^tInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Ul. Gronostajowa 7, 30-387, Kraków, Poland 
900 |a ^aSzentgyörgyi^bH.^tInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 40170-210, Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil 
900 |a ^aViana^bB.F.^tDepartment of Entomology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States 
900 |a ^aWestphal^bC.^tInstitute of Ecology, Section Ecosystem Functions, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, ScharnhorststraÃYe 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany 
900 |a ^aWinfree^bR. 
900 |a ^aKlein^bA.M. 
900 |a ^tEcology Letters^cEcol. Lett. 
900 |a eng 
900 |a 1062 
900 |a ^i 
900 |a Vol. 14, no. 10 
900 |a 1072 
900 |a APIS MELLIFERA 
900 |a BOMBUS SPP. 
900 |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 
900 |a FLOWER VISITORS 
900 |a LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT 
900 |a POLLINATOR SERVICES 
900 |a RICHNESS 
900 |a SPATIAL STABILITY 
900 |a SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES 
900 |a TEMPORAL STABILITY 
900 |a AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 
900 |a AGRICULTURAL LAND 
900 |a APICULTURE 
900 |a BIODIVERSITY 
900 |a BIOME 
900 |a CROP PRODUCTION 
900 |a DATA SET 
900 |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICE 
900 |a FLOWER VISITING 
900 |a FRUIT SET 
900 |a HONEYBEE 
900 |a ISOLATED POPULATION 
900 |a LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY 
900 |a LANDSCAPE PLANNING 
900 |a POLLINATION 
900 |a POLLINATOR 
900 |a PRISTINE ENVIRONMENT 
900 |a RESTORATION ECOLOGY 
900 |a SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS 
900 |a SUSTAINABILITY 
900 |a AGRICULTURE 
900 |a ECOSYSTEM 
900 |a PHYSIOLOGY 
900 |a ANIMALS 
900 |a BEES 
900 |a BIODIVERSITY 
900 |a HEXAPODA 
900 |a Sustainable agricultural landscapes by definition provide high magnitude and stability of ecosystem services, biodiversity and crop productivity. However, few studies have considered landscape effects on the stability of ecosystem services. We tested whether isolation from florally diverse natural and semi-natural areas reduces the spatial and temporal stability of flower-visitor richness and pollination services in crop fields. We synthesised data from 29 studies with contrasting biomes, crop species and pollinator communities. Stability of flower-visitor richness, visitation rate [all insects except honey bees] and fruit set all decreased with distance from natural areas. At 1km from adjacent natural areas, spatial stability decreased by 25, 16 and 9 percent for richness, visitation and fruit set, respectively, while temporal stability decreased by 39 percent for richness and 13 percent for visitation. Mean richness, visitation and fruit set also decreased with isolation, by 34, 27 and 16 percent at 1km respectively. In contrast, honey bee visitation did not change with isolation and represented less than 25 percent of crop visits in 21 studies. Therefore, wild pollinators are relevant for crop productivity and stability even when honey bees are abundant. Policies to preserve and restore natural areas in agricultural landscapes should enhance levels and reliability of pollination services. 
900 |a 14 
900 |a 10 
900 |a 2011 
900 |a ^cH 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a AGROVOC 
900 |a 2011Garibaldi2 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Garibaldi2.pdf 
900 |a 2011Garibaldi2.pdf 
900 |a http://www.wiley.com/ 
900 |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-80052800535&partnerID=40&md5=43f51bf0115381c30dddfa94bcd28863 
900 |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i 
900 |a OS 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO  |2 udc 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA  |2 udc