Transportability of confined field trial data for environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants a conceptual framework

It is commonly held that confined field trials [CFTs] used to evaluate the potential adverse environmental impacts of a genetically engineered [GE] plant should be conducted in each country where cultivation is intended, even when relevant and potentially sufficient data are already available from s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Garcia Alonso, Mónica, Hendley, Paul, Bigler, Franz, Mayeregger, Edgar, Parker, Ronald, Rubinstein, Clara, Satorre, Emilio Horacio, Solari, Fernando, McLean, Morven A.
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Español
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2014garciaalonso.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 07532cab a22011297a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000643
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220914105404.0
008 181208t2014 |||||o|||||00||||spa d
999 |c 47039  |d 47039 
022 |a 0962-8819 
024 |a 10.1007/s11248-014-9785-0 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Transportability of confined field trial data for environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants   |b a conceptual framework 
520 |a It is commonly held that confined field trials [CFTs] used to evaluate the potential adverse environmental impacts of a genetically engineered [GE] plant should be conducted in each country where cultivation is intended, even when relevant and potentially sufficient data are already available from studies conducted elsewhere. The acceptance of data generated in CFTs "out of country" can only be realized in practice if the agro-climatic zone where a CFT is conducted is demonstrably representative of the agro-climatic zones in those geographies to which the data will be transported. In an attempt to elaborate this idea, a multi-disciplinary Working Group of scientists collaborated to develop a conceptual framework and associated process that can be used by the regulated and regulatory communities to support transportability of CFT data for environmental risk assessment [ERA]. As proposed here, application of the conceptual framework provides a scientifically defensible process for evaluating if existing CFT data from remote sites are relevant and/or sufficient for local ERAs. Additionally, it promotes a strategic approach to identifying CFT site locations so that field data will be transportable from one regulatory jurisdiction to another. Application of the framework and process should be particularly beneficial to public sector product developers and small enterprises that develop innovative GE events but cannot afford to replicate redundant CFTs, and to regulatory authorities seeking to improve the deployment of limited institutional resources. 
653 0 |a AGRO-CLIMATIC ZONE 
653 0 |a CONFINED FIELD TRIAL 
653 0 |a GENETICALLY ENGINEERED PLANT 
653 0 |a REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 
653 0 |a TRANSPORTABILITY 
700 1 |a Garcia Alonso, Mónica  |9 72805 
700 1 |a Hendley, Paul  |9 72806 
700 1 |a Bigler, Franz  |9 72807 
700 1 |a Mayeregger, Edgar  |9 72808 
700 1 |a Parker, Ronald  |9 72809 
700 1 |a Rubinstein, Clara  |9 29518 
700 1 |9 9841  |a Satorre, Emilio Horacio 
700 1 |a Solari, Fernando  |9 11145 
700 1 |a McLean, Morven A.   |9 72813 
773 |t Transgenic Research  |g vol.23, no.6 (2014), p.1025-1041 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2014garciaalonso.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2014garciaalonso  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://link.springer.com/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
900 |a as 
900 |a 20150908 
900 |a N 
900 |a SCOPUS 
900 |a a 
900 |a s 
900 |a ARTICULO 
900 |a EN LINEA 
900 |a 09628819 
900 |a 10.1007/s11248-014-9785-0 
900 |a ^tTransportability of confined field trial data for environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants^sa conceptual framework 
900 |a ^aGarcia-Alonso^bM. 
900 |a ^aHendley^bP. 
900 |a ^aBigler^bF. 
900 |a ^aMayeregger^bE. 
900 |a ^aParker^bR. 
900 |a ^aRubinstein^bC. 
900 |a ^aSatorre^bE. 
900 |a ^aSolari^bF. 
900 |a ^aMcLean^bM.A. 
900 |a ^aGarcia Alonso^bM. 
900 |a ^aHendley^bP. 
900 |a ^aBigler^bF. 
900 |a ^aMayeregger^bE. 
900 |a ^aParker^bR. 
900 |a ^aRubinstein^bC. 
900 |a ^aSatorre^bE. H. 
900 |a ^aSolari^bF. 
900 |a ^aMcLean^bM. A. 
900 |a Garcia-Alonso, M. Estel Consult Ltd., 5 Hillside Drive, BinfieldBerkshire, United Kingdom 
900 |a Hendley, P. Phasera Ltd., 7 Kenilworth Avenue, BracknellBerkshire, United Kingdom 
900 |a Bigler, F. Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon, Reckenholzstrasse 191Zurich, Switzerland 
900 |a Mayeregger, E. Unidad de Gestión del Riesgo, Ministerio de AgriculturaAsunción, Paraguay 
900 |a Parker, R. Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, United States Environmental Protection Agency, One Potomac Yard, 2777 S. Crystal DriveArlington, VA, United States 
900 |a Rubinstein, C. ILSI Argentina, Av Santa Fe 1145, 4° pisoBuenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a Satorre, E. IFEVA, Cátedra de Cerealicultura, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Avda. San Martín 4453Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a Solari, F. Monsanto Argentina SAIC, Estacion Experimental Fontezuela, Ruta 8 km 214, Fontezuela, Partido de PergaminoBuenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a McLean, M.A. Center for Environmental Risk Assessment, ILSI Research Foundation, 1156 Fifteenth Street NW, Suite 200Washington, DC, United States 
900 |a ^tTransgenic Research^cTransgenic Res. 
900 |a eng 
900 |a 1025 
900 |a ^i 
900 |a Vol. 23, no. 6 
900 |a 1041 
900 |a AGRO-CLIMATIC ZONE 
900 |a CONFINED FIELD TRIAL 
900 |a GENETICALLY ENGINEERED PLANT 
900 |a REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 
900 |a TRANSPORTABILITY 
900 |a It is commonly held that confined field trials [CFTs] used to evaluate the potential adverse environmental impacts of a genetically engineered [GE] plant should be conducted in each country where cultivation is intended, even when relevant and potentially sufficient data are already available from studies conducted elsewhere. The acceptance of data generated in CFTs "out of country" can only be realized in practice if the agro-climatic zone where a CFT is conducted is demonstrably representative of the agro-climatic zones in those geographies to which the data will be transported. In an attempt to elaborate this idea, a multi-disciplinary Working Group of scientists collaborated to develop a conceptual framework and associated process that can be used by the regulated and regulatory communities to support transportability of CFT data for environmental risk assessment [ERA]. As proposed here, application of the conceptual framework provides a scientifically defensible process for evaluating if existing CFT data from remote sites are relevant and/or sufficient for local ERAs. Additionally, it promotes a strategic approach to identifying CFT site locations so that field data will be transportable from one regulatory jurisdiction to another. Application of the framework and process should be particularly beneficial to public sector product developers and small enterprises that develop innovative GE events but cannot afford to replicate redundant CFTs, and to regulatory authorities seeking to improve the deployment of limited institutional resources. 
900 |a 23 
900 |a 6 
900 |a 2014 
900 |a ^cH 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a AGROVOC 
900 |a 2014garciaalonso 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2014garciaalonso.pdf 
900 |a http://link.springer.com/ 
900 |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84916934762&partnerID=40&md5=3b40bd4078d5a055e402332e3fbf7782 
900 |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i 
900 |a OS 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO  |2 udc 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA  |2 udc