Continuous moderate grazing management promotes biomass production in Patagonian arid rangelands

Domestic grazing effects on primary productivity and community structure are controversial in rangeland ecology and frequently misunderstood. Although directly related with secondary production, biomass stock and biomass production at species level [biomass composition] has been relegated in field s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Oñatibia, Gastón R.
Otros Autores: Aguiar, Martín Roberto
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2016onatibia.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 02536cab a22003137a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000960
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220926163450.0
008 181208t2016 |||||o|||||00||||eng d
999 |c 47316  |d 47316 
999 |d 47316 
022 |a  0140-1963 
024 |a 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.10.005 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
100 1 |9 33451  |a Oñatibia, Gastón R. 
245 0 0 |a Continuous moderate grazing management promotes biomass production in Patagonian arid rangelands 
520 |a Domestic grazing effects on primary productivity and community structure are controversial in rangeland ecology and frequently misunderstood. Although directly related with secondary production, biomass stock and biomass production at species level [biomass composition] has been relegated in field studies, especially in arid rangelands co - dominated by woody species. We estimated grazing effects on aboveground biomass in a temperate mixed grass - shrub steppe of Patagonia. We compared exclusion of sheep with two levels of continuous grazing: moderate [light] and intensive sheep grazing in an average precipitation year. Total green biomass [productivity] was twice as high in moderately grazed paddocks as in those without grazing and intensively grazed pastures, while standing dead grass biomass stock only decreased in intensive grazing. Shrub biomass was not modified by grazing management. In addition, grazing modified grass specific biomass composition, thus diminishing biomass quality in intensively grazed areas. This work provides evidence that in arid rangelands, continuous moderate grazing management could be an effective tool to increase productivity compared to grazing exclusion. Furthermore, moderate grazing would not cause major undesired changes in species composition. However, a potential risk of land use intensification exists because intensive grazing could decrease biomass production as well as promote negative composition changes. 
653 0 |a DOMESTIC HERBIVORES 
653 0 |a GRASSES 
653 0 |a GRAZING OPTIMIZATION PROCESS 
653 0 |a PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY 
653 0 |a SHRUBS 
700 1 |9 12939  |a Aguiar, Martín Roberto 
773 |t Journal of Arid Environments  |g vol.125 (2016), p.73-79, grafs., tbls. 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2016onatibia.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2016onatibia  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u https://www.elsevier.com  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG