Hydrological and physico - chemical dynamics in two Andean streams

Hydrological and physico-chemical dynamics in two Andean streams Discharge (Q) is an essential variable to understand how fluvial ecosystems function. To this aim, we assessed the hydrological and physico-chemical dynamics of two contrasting streams in Andean Patagonia: Casa de Piedra (CP) and Gutié...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Sosnovsky, Alejandro, Rechencq, Magalí, Fernández, María Valeria, Suárez, María José, Cantet, Rodolfo Juan Carlos
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2020sosnovsky.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 05053nab a22004217a 4500
001 20201026213027.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220318104309.0
008 201026t sp |||||o|||| 00| | eng d
999 |c 53909  |d 53909 
999 |d 53909 
999 |d 53909 
999 |d 53909 
999 |d 53909 
999 |d 53909 
999 |d 53909 
999 |d 53909 
999 |d 53909 
022 |a 0213-8409 
024 |a 10.23818/limn.39.02 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Hydrological and physico - chemical dynamics in two Andean streams 
520 |a Hydrological and physico-chemical dynamics in two Andean streams Discharge (Q) is an essential variable to understand how fluvial ecosystems function. To this aim, we assessed the hydrological and physico-chemical dynamics of two contrasting streams in Andean Patagonia: Casa de Piedra (CP) and Gutiérrez (G). CP originates in a small lake (0.15 km2) situated at high-elevation, whereas the source of G is a large (17 km2) piedmont lake. There are other differences between the drainage basins of these streams: CP drainage basin covers 63 km2 and slopes steep (33.9 m/km), while that of G is bigger (162 km2) and gentler (5.9 m/km). The current research was carried out over a period of 1 year. Variables measured were precipitation and temperature, as well as hydrological data (Q = discharge, EC = electrical conductivity, water temperature, turbidity and pH). The climate and topography of the region led to 3 distinct hydrological periods: stormflow, meltflow and baseflow. Discharge presented a clear seasonal pattern with higher values at meltflow, due to snow melting from the mountains. Stream CP was very flashy (high variation in flow regime), unlike stream G. The greatest flashiness was observed during the stormflow period. Baseflow was characterised by low values of Q. The temperature of water fluctuated between the different hydrological periods and between the study streams, whereas pH varied seasonally only. Great turbidity in the streams was observed during the stormflow period, as a result of high run-off. Throughout the year, the relation between Q and EC in CP revealed different hydrological flowpaths towards the stream: flows derived from melting snow, lateral flows through the landscape and groundwater flows. In contrast, EC in stream G was high and constant during the whole recording period, independently of Q. This indicates that the large headwater lake is its main source of water. This lake clearly affected the physico-chemical dynamics of stream G. In brief, the current research brought new knowledge into the ecological aspects of hydrological processes acting on the Andean-Patagonian aquatic ecosystems. On the basis of the results presented here and on expected future trends, we believe that the hydrological and physico-chemical dynamics of these ecosystems will be highly affected by climate change. 
653 |a PATAGONIA 
653 |a DISCHARGE 
653 |a ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY 
653 |a HYDROLOGICAL PERIODS 
700 1 |a Sosnovsky, Alejandro  |u Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Grupo de Evaluación y Manejo de Recursos Ícticos (INIBIOMA). San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Grupo de Evaluación y Manejo de Recursos Ícticos (INIBIOMA). San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.  |9 42199 
700 1 |a Rechencq, Magalí  |u Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Grupo de Evaluación y Manejo de Recursos Ícticos (INIBIOMA). San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Grupo de Evaluación y Manejo de Recursos Ícticos (INIBIOMA). San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.  |9 67854 
700 1 |a Fernández, María Valeria  |u Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Grupo de Evaluación y Manejo de Recursos Ícticos (INIBIOMA). San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Grupo de Evaluación y Manejo de Recursos Ícticos (INIBIOMA). San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.  |9 71892 
700 1 |a Suárez, María José  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Animal. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 21257 
700 1 |9 12817  |a Cantet, Rodolfo Juan Carlos  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Animal. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
773 0 |t Limnetica  |g vol.39, no.1 (2020), p.17-33, grafs., tbls., mapas 
856 |f 2020sosnovsky  |i en reservorio  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2020sosnovsky.pdf  |x ARTI202011 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR  |u https://www.limnetica.com 
942 |c ARTICULO  |n 1 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG