Fungal endophytes can eliminate the plant growth – defence trade - off

A trade-off between growth and defence functions is commonly observed in plants. We propose that the association of plants with Epichlo€e fungal endophytes may eliminate this trade-off. This would be a consequence of the double role of these endophytes in host plants: the stimulation of plant growth...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bastías, Daniel A.
Otros Autores: Gianolini, Pablo Roberto, Gundel, Pedro Emilio
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2021bastias.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 02566cab a22003737a 4500
001 20220706122430.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220928122200.0
008 220706t2021 xxkad|||o|||| 00| 0 eng d
999 |c 54778  |d 54778 
999 |d 54778 
999 |d 54778 
999 |d 54778 
999 |d 54778 
022 |a 1469-8137 
024 |a 10.1111/nph.17335 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
100 1 |9 67139  |a Bastías, Daniel A.  |u Resilient Agriculture Innovation Centre of Excellence. AgResearch Limited. Grasslands Research Centre. Palmerston North, New Zealand. 
245 0 0 |a Fungal endophytes can eliminate the plant growth – defence trade - off 
520 |a A trade-off between growth and defence functions is commonly observed in plants. We propose that the association of plants with Epichlo€e fungal endophytes may eliminate this trade-off. This would be a consequence of the double role of these endophytes in host plants: the stimulation of plant growth hormones (e.g. gibberellins) and the fungal production of antiherbivore alkaloids. We put forward a model that integrates this dual effect of endophytes on plant growth and defence and test its predictions by means of meta-analysis of published literature. Our results support the notion that the enhanced plant resistance promoted by endophytes does not compromise plant growth. The limits and ecological benefits of this endophyte-mediated lack of plant growth – defence trade - off are discussed. 
650 |2 Agrovoc  |9 26 
653 |a ALKALOIDS 
653 |a ENDOPHYTES 
653 |a GROWTH DEFENCE TRADE 
653 |a PHYTOHORMONES 
653 |a SYMBIOSIS 
700 1 |a Gianolini, Pablo Roberto  |u Universidad de La Serena. Departamento de Biología. La Serena, Chile.  |u Universidad de Concepción. Departamento de Botánica. Concepción, Chile.  |9 23646 
700 1 |a Gundel, Pedro Emilio  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 28667 
773 0 |t New phytologist  |w (AR-BaUFA)SECS001166  |g Vol.230, no.6 (2021), p.2105-2113, il., grafs. 
856 |f 2021bastias  |i en reservorio  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2021bastias.pdf  |x ARTI202206 
856 |u http://www.wiley.com/  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG