Permissions in contracts, a logical insight

Despite the fact that contracts are, by definition, an agreement between two or more parties, most formal studies limit themselves to contracts regulating only a single party or the parties independently of each other, without looking into how permissions, obligations or prohibitions of one party af...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pace, G.J
Otros Autores: Schapachnik, F.
Formato: Capítulo de libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: IOS Press 2011
Acceso en línea:Registro en Scopus
DOI
Handle
Registro en la Biblioteca Digital
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 03489caa a22004937a 4500
001 PAPER-10000
003 AR-BaUEN
005 20230518204000.0
008 190411s2011 xx ||||fo|||| 00| 0 eng|d
024 7 |2 scopus  |a 2-s2.0-83655191578 
040 |a Scopus  |b spa  |c AR-BaUEN  |d AR-BaUEN 
100 1 |a Pace, G.J. 
245 1 0 |a Permissions in contracts, a logical insight 
260 |b IOS Press  |c 2011 
270 1 0 |m Pace, G.J.; University of MaltaMalta; email: gordon.pace@um.edu.mt 
506 |2 openaire  |e Política editorial 
504 |a Arnold, A., Nivat's processes and their synchronization (2002) Theor. Comput. Sci, 281, pp. 31-36. , June 
504 |a Governatori, G., Milosevic, Z., Dealing with contract violations: Formalism and domain specific language (2005) EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference 2005 Ninth IEEE International, pp. 46-57. , IEEE 
504 |a Herrestad, H., Krogh, C., Deontic logic relativised to bearers and counterparties (1995) Anniversary Anthology in Computers and Law, pp. 453-522 
504 |a Marjanovic, O., Milosevic, Z., Towards formal modeling of e-contracts (2001) Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, EDOC '01, p. 59. , Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society 
520 3 |a Despite the fact that contracts are, by definition, an agreement between two or more parties, most formal studies limit themselves to contracts regulating only a single party or the parties independently of each other, without looking into how permissions, obligations or prohibitions of one party affect the other. This article deals with the analysis of what different types of permissions mean in the context of contracts. To give formal semantics we use an automata based formalism allowing to model for one party agreeing, delaying or plain refusing on performing certain actions that the other is attempting. This approach also yields a natural notion of contract strictness analysis for each party. © 2011 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.  |l eng 
593 |a University of Malta, Malta 
593 |a Departamento de Computación, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina 
690 1 0 |a AUTOMATED LEGISLATIVE DRAFTING 
690 1 0 |a CONTRACT VERIFICATION 
690 1 0 |a PERMISSIONS 
690 1 0 |a FORMAL METHODS 
690 1 0 |a SEMANTICS 
690 1 0 |a AUTOMATA-BASED FORMALISMS 
690 1 0 |a AUTOMATED LEGISLATIVE DRAFTING 
690 1 0 |a FORMAL SEMANTICS 
690 1 0 |a FORMAL STUDIES 
690 1 0 |a PERMISSIONS 
690 1 0 |a STRICTNESS ANALYSIS 
690 1 0 |a LAWS AND LEGISLATION 
700 1 |a Schapachnik, F. 
773 0 |d IOS Press, 2011  |g v. 235  |h pp. 140-144  |p Front. Artif. Intell. Appl.  |x 09226389  |z 9781607509806  |t Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 
856 4 1 |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-83655191578&doi=10.3233%2f978-1-60750-981-3-140&partnerID=40&md5=0478b2bde92eb6faf9a4e3454190cad9  |y Registro en Scopus 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-981-3-140  |y DOI 
856 4 0 |u https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09226389_v235_n_p140_Pace  |y Handle 
856 4 0 |u https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_09226389_v235_n_p140_Pace  |y Registro en la Biblioteca Digital 
961 |a paper_09226389_v235_n_p140_Pace  |b paper  |c PE 
962 |a info:eu-repo/semantics/article  |a info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  |b info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 
999 |c 70953