Males choose to keep their heads: Preference for lower risk females in a praying mantid
Male reproductive success is obviously mate limited, which implies that males should rarely be choosy. One extreme case of a reproductive (or mating) cost is sexual cannibalism. Recent research has proposed that male mantids (Parastagmatoptera tessellata) are choosy and not complicit in cannibalism...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | , , |
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Registro en Scopus DOI Handle Registro en la Biblioteca Digital |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 10416caa a22012137a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PAPER-15804 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUEN | ||
| 005 | 20230518204636.0 | ||
| 008 | 190411s2016 xx ||||fo|||| 00| 0 eng|d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |2 scopus |a 2-s2.0-84974687478 | |
| 040 | |a Scopus |b spa |c AR-BaUEN |d AR-BaUEN | ||
| 030 | |a BPROD | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Avigliano, E. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Males choose to keep their heads: Preference for lower risk females in a praying mantid |
| 260 | |b Elsevier B.V. |c 2016 | ||
| 270 | 1 | 0 | |m Pompilio, L.; Laboratorio de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución and oIEGEBA-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II Ciudad UniversitariaArgentina; email: lopompilio@yahoo.com.ar |
| 506 | |2 openaire |e Política editorial | ||
| 504 | |a Andrade, M.C.B., Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian redback spider (1996) Science, 271, pp. 70-72 | ||
| 504 | |a Arnqvist, G., Henriksson, S., Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints (1997) Evol. Ecol., 11, pp. 255-273 | ||
| 504 | |a Barry, K.L., Sexual deception in a cannibalistic mating system? Testing the Femme Fatale hypothesis (2015) Proc. Biol. Sci., 282, p. 20141428 | ||
| 504 | |a Barry, K.L., Holwell, G.I., Herberstein, M.E., Female praying mantids use sexual cannibalism as a foraging strategy to increase fecundity (2008) Behav. Ecol., 19, pp. 710-715 | ||
| 504 | |a Barry, K.L., Holwell, G.I., Herberstein, M.E., Male mating behaviour reduces the risk of sexual cannibalism in an Australian praying mantid (2009) J. Ethol., 27, pp. 377-383 | ||
| 504 | |a Barry, K.L., Holwell, G.I., Herberstein, M.E., Multimodal mate assessment by male praying mantids in a sexually cannibalistic mating system (2010) Anim. Behav., 79, pp. 1165-1172 | ||
| 504 | |a Brown, W.D., Muntz, G.A., Ladowski, A.J., Low mate encounter rate increases male risk taking in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantis (2012) PLoS One, 7, p. e35377 | ||
| 504 | |a Elgar, M.A., Nash, D.R., Sexual cannibalism in the garden spider Araneus diadematus (1988) Anim. Behav., 36, pp. 1511-1517 | ||
| 504 | |a Elgar, M.A., Schneider, J.M., Evolutionary significance of sexual cannibalism (2004) Adv. Study Behav., 34, pp. 135-163 | ||
| 504 | |a Fromhage, L., Schneider, J., Safer sex with feeding females: sexual conflict in a cannibalistic spider (2004) Behav. Ecol., 16, pp. 377-382 | ||
| 504 | |a Gemeno, C., Claramunt, J., Sexual approach in the praying mantid Mantis religiosa (L.) (2006) J. Insect Behav., 19, pp. 731-740 | ||
| 504 | |a Jayaweera, A., Rathnayake, D.N., Davis, K.S., Barry, K.L., The risk of sexual cannibalism and its effect on male approach and mating behaviour in a praying mantid (2015) Anim. Behav., 110, pp. 113-119 | ||
| 504 | |a Johnson, J.C., Sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): an evaluation of two explanations for female aggression towards potential mates (2001) Anim. Behav., 61, pp. 905-914 | ||
| 504 | |a Kynaston, S., McErlain-Ward, P., Mill, P., Courtship, mating behaviour and sexual cannibalism in the praying mantis, Sphodromantis lineola (1994) Anim. Behav., 47, pp. 739-741 | ||
| 504 | |a Lawrence, S.E., Sexual cannibalism in the praying mantid, Mantis religiosa: a field study (1992) Anim. Behav., 43, pp. 569-583 | ||
| 504 | |a Lelito, J.P., Brown, W.D., Complicity or conflict over sexual cannibalism? Male risk taking in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia sinensis (2006) Am. Nat., 168, pp. 263-269 | ||
| 504 | |a Maxwell, M.R., Mating behavior (1999) The Praying Mantids., pp. 69-89. , Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, F. Prete, H. Wells, P. Wells, L. Hurd (Eds.) | ||
| 504 | |a Maxwell, M.R., The risk of cannibalism and male mating behavior in the Mediterranean praying mantid, Iris oratoria (1999) Behaviour, 136, pp. 205-219 | ||
| 504 | |a Maxwell, M.R., Gallego, K.M., Barry, K.L., Effects of female feeding regime in a sexually cannibalistic mantid: fecundity, cannibalism, and male response in Stagmomantis limbata (Mantodea) (2010) Ecol. Entomol., 35, pp. 775-787 | ||
| 504 | |a Peretti, A.V., Acosta, L.E., Benton, T.G., Sexual cannibalism in scorpions: fact or fiction? (1999) Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 68, pp. 485-496 | ||
| 504 | |a Prenter, J., Elwood, R.W., Montgomery, W.I., Male exploitation of female predatory behaviour reduces sexual cannibalism in male autumn spiders, Metellina segmentata (1994) Anim. Behav., 47, pp. 235-236 | ||
| 504 | |a Prokop, P., Václav, R., Males respond to the risk of sperm competition in the sexually cannibalistic praying mantis, Mantis religiosa (2005) Ethology, 111, pp. 836-848 | ||
| 504 | |a Prokop, P., Václav, R., Seasonal aspects of sexual cannibalism in the praying mantis (Mantis religiosa) (2008) J. Ethol., 26, pp. 213-218 | ||
| 504 | |a Roeder, K., An experimental analysis of the sexual behavior of the praying mantis (Mantis religiosa L.) (1935) Biol. Bull., LXIX, pp. 203-220 | ||
| 504 | |a Scardamaglia, R.C., Fosacheca, S., Pompilio, L., Sexual conflict in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantid: males prefer low-risk over high-risk females (2015) Anim. Behav., 99, pp. 9-14 | ||
| 504 | |a Schneider, J.M., Sexual cannibalism as a manifestation of sexual conflict (2014) Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol., 6 | ||
| 504 | |a Schneider, J.M., Elgar, M.A., Sexual cannibalism in Nephila plumipes as a consequence of female life history strategies (2002) J. Evol. Biol., 15, pp. 84-91 | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Male reproductive success is obviously mate limited, which implies that males should rarely be choosy. One extreme case of a reproductive (or mating) cost is sexual cannibalism. Recent research has proposed that male mantids (Parastagmatoptera tessellata) are choosy and not complicit in cannibalism and that they modify behavior towards females based on the risk imposed by them. Since female cannibalism depends on females' energetic state (i.e. hunger) we investigated whether male mantids are capable of using environmental cues that provide information regarding the energetic state of females to make their mate choices. Under laboratory conditions, males were confronted individually with three options: a female eating a prey, a female without a prey, and a male eating a prey (as a control for the presence of prey). Each subject comprising a choice was harnessed and placed in the corners of a triangular experimental arena at an equidistant distance from the focal male. The prey was a middle size cricket that subjects ate in approximately twenty minutes. The behavior of focal males was recorded for six hours. Females were under the same deprivation regime and, in line with previous studies, consuming one cricket did not significantly increase females' abdomen girth. Male mantids significantly preferred females that were eating a prey. In all cases choices were made after the females consumed the whole prey. This suggests that males did not use the prey as a direct way to avoid being cannibalized by keeping the female busy. The preference for females that had recently fed may have evolved because of the potential reduction in sexual cannibalism. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.. |l eng | |
| 536 | |a Detalles de la financiación: Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica | ||
| 536 | |a Detalles de la financiación: Universidad de Buenos Aires | ||
| 536 | |a Detalles de la financiación: Universidad de Buenos Aires | ||
| 536 | |a Detalles de la financiación: L.P. is Researcher at CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas). This work was supported by the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica and the Universidad de Buenos Aires . R.C.S. was supported by an undergraduate fellowship from the Universidad of Buenos Aires . We would like to thank Daniel Campioni for help with preparation of Fig. 1 . | ||
| 593 | |a Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución and IEGEBA-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina | ||
| 593 | |a Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina | ||
| 593 | |a Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA-CONICET-UBA), Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Argentina | ||
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MATE CHOICE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a PARASTAGMATOPTERA TESSELLATA |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a PRAYING MANTID |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a SEXUAL CANNIBALISM |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a SEXUAL CONFLICT |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a CANNIBALISM |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a CRICKET |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a ENVIRONMENTAL CUE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a FEMALE BEHAVIOR |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a LABORATORY METHOD |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MATE CHOICE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a RESEARCH WORK |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a SEXUAL CONFLICT |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a CANNIBALISM |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a CONTROLLED STUDY |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a EATING |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a FEMALE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a HEAD |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a HUMAN |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a HUMAN EXPERIMENT |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a HUNGER |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MALE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MANTODEA |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MATE CHOICE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a ANIMAL |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a DECISION MAKING |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MANTODEA |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a PHYSIOLOGY |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a SEXUAL BEHAVIOR |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MANTIDAE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MANTODEA |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a ANIMALS |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a CANNIBALISM |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a CHOICE BEHAVIOR |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a FEMALE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MALE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MANTODEA |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |2 spines |a ABDOMEN |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scardamaglia, R.C. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gabelli, F.M. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pompilio, L. | |
| 773 | 0 | |d Elsevier B.V., 2016 |g v. 129 |h pp. 80-85 |p Behav. Processes |x 03766357 |w (AR-BaUEN)CENRE-3907 |t Behavioural Processes | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84974687478&doi=10.1016%2fj.beproc.2016.06.005&partnerID=40&md5=ecde9ee8dedcb357befef0a58cf8ce1f |y Registro en Scopus |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.005 |y DOI |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03766357_v129_n_p80_Avigliano |y Handle |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03766357_v129_n_p80_Avigliano |y Registro en la Biblioteca Digital |
| 961 | |a paper_03766357_v129_n_p80_Avigliano |b paper |c PE | ||
| 962 | |a info:eu-repo/semantics/article |a info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |b info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ||
| 999 | |c 76757 | ||