Interpretative trends and Standards of Proof of Fact for the Attribution to the State of Individual Conduct in the Recent Jurisprudence of International Courts
The present work is concentrated on the analysis of new interpretive trends with regard to the standard of proof for the attribution to the state of unequivocal conduct of liability through international jurisprudence in comparison with various courts of various statutes and different attributions t...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Estudios Avanzados. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revesint/article/view/29693 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R306-article-29693 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R306-article-296932025-08-15T22:16:42Z Interpretative trends and Standards of Proof of Fact for the Attribution to the State of Individual Conduct in the Recent Jurisprudence of International Courts Tendencias interpretativas y estándares de prueba de hecho para la atribución al estado de conducta individual en la jurisprudencia reciente de los tribunales internacionales Liakopoulos, Dimitris ECHR Individual conduct of liability ICTY International jurisprudence TEDH Conducta individual de responsabilidad TPIY CIT Jurisprudencia internacional The present work is concentrated on the analysis of new interpretive trends with regard to the standard of proof for the attribution to the state of unequivocal conduct of liability through international jurisprudence in comparison with various courts of various statutes and different attributions that remain always under the same level of punishment for international responsibility. El presente trabajo se concentra en el análisis de nuevas tendencias interpretativas conrespecto al estándar de prueba para la atribución al estado de conducta inequívoca deresponsabilidad a través de la jurisprudencia internacional en comparación con varios tribunales devarios estatutos y diferentes atribuciones que permanecen siempre bajo el mismo nivel de castigopor responsabilidad internacional. Centro de Estudios Avanzados. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. 2020-07-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revesint/article/view/29693 1991. Revista de Estudios Internacionales; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2020): Neoliberalismo recargado: un estado de la cuestión. Enero-Junio 2020; 74-96 2683-720X eng https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revesint/article/view/29693/30542 Derechos de autor 2020 1991. Revista de Estudios Internacionales https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-306 |
| container_title_str |
1991. Revista de Estudios Internacionales |
| language |
Inglés |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
ECHR Individual conduct of liability ICTY International jurisprudence TEDH Conducta individual de responsabilidad TPIY CIT Jurisprudencia internacional |
| spellingShingle |
ECHR Individual conduct of liability ICTY International jurisprudence TEDH Conducta individual de responsabilidad TPIY CIT Jurisprudencia internacional Liakopoulos, Dimitris Interpretative trends and Standards of Proof of Fact for the Attribution to the State of Individual Conduct in the Recent Jurisprudence of International Courts |
| topic_facet |
ECHR Individual conduct of liability ICTY International jurisprudence TEDH Conducta individual de responsabilidad TPIY CIT Jurisprudencia internacional |
| author |
Liakopoulos, Dimitris |
| author_facet |
Liakopoulos, Dimitris |
| author_sort |
Liakopoulos, Dimitris |
| title |
Interpretative trends and Standards of Proof of Fact for the Attribution to the State of Individual Conduct in the Recent Jurisprudence of International Courts |
| title_short |
Interpretative trends and Standards of Proof of Fact for the Attribution to the State of Individual Conduct in the Recent Jurisprudence of International Courts |
| title_full |
Interpretative trends and Standards of Proof of Fact for the Attribution to the State of Individual Conduct in the Recent Jurisprudence of International Courts |
| title_fullStr |
Interpretative trends and Standards of Proof of Fact for the Attribution to the State of Individual Conduct in the Recent Jurisprudence of International Courts |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Interpretative trends and Standards of Proof of Fact for the Attribution to the State of Individual Conduct in the Recent Jurisprudence of International Courts |
| title_sort |
interpretative trends and standards of proof of fact for the attribution to the state of individual conduct in the recent jurisprudence of international courts |
| description |
The present work is concentrated on the analysis of new interpretive trends with regard to the standard of proof for the attribution to the state of unequivocal conduct of liability through international jurisprudence in comparison with various courts of various statutes and different attributions that remain always under the same level of punishment for international responsibility. |
| publisher |
Centro de Estudios Avanzados. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revesint/article/view/29693 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT liakopoulosdimitris interpretativetrendsandstandardsofproofoffactfortheattributiontothestateofindividualconductintherecentjurisprudenceofinternationalcourts AT liakopoulosdimitris tendenciasinterpretativasyestandaresdepruebadehechoparalaatribucionalestadodeconductaindividualenlajurisprudenciarecientedelostribunalesinternacionales |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T20:24:33Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-08-27T05:03:21Z |
| _version_ |
1841583621692981248 |