Comparative analysis of different precision retainer systems: part 2

The presence of a free end a removable partial dentures involves a major problem in the clinic. In fact, it is known that there is difficulty in treating multiplying by 2.5 the risk of complications. The gaps without posterior abutment are difficult to restore later, require a support tooth and muco...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dib et al
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Odontología 2020
Materias:
Prótesis, Parcial, Removible, Ataches, Deformación, Strain Gauge
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/30007
Aporte de:
Revista de la Facultad de Odontología de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R335-article-30007
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R335-article-300072020-08-21T11:48:19Z Comparative analysis of different precision retainer systems: part 2 Análisis comparativo de diferentes sistemas de retenedores de precisión: parte 2 Dib et al Prótesis, Parcial, Removible, Ataches, Deformación, Strain Gauge The presence of a free end a removable partial dentures involves a major problem in the clinic. In fact, it is known that there is difficulty in treating multiplying by 2.5 the risk of complications. The gaps without posterior abutment are difficult to restore later, require a support tooth and mucosa. The oral mucosa and the ligament periodontal of the abutments teeth respond differently to the loads. This difference in behavior of teeth and mucosa is what has led to the design of removable partial dentures to be rigid or resilient characteristics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the deformation of different extra coronary attachments systems; and to determine through strain gauge analysis the loads that each system causes on the most distal pillar elements that these attachments carry. An experimental model of the partially edentulous upper maxilla of Kennedy class I was constructed to measure the deformation that occurs in the most distal dental elements. Three extra coronary precision attachments were analyzed: rod attachment (RA), strategy (SA), and Anker system (AS) to determine and compare their behavior in later bilateral teeth (Kennedy class I) in the upper jaw. The results showed that at the deformation and at a load of 10 dan (decanewton), AS attachments presented, less deformation in the distal elements carrying said attachments while RA presented the highest values. La presencia de un extremo libre en prótesis parcial removible implica un problema importante en la clínica. Existe una dificultad en el tratamiento multiplicando por 2,5 el riesgo de aparición de complicaciones. Las brechas sin pilar posterior son difíciles de restaurar, requieren de un soporte dentario y otro mucoso. La mucosa oral y el ligamento periodontal de los elementos dentarios pilares responden de manera diferente a las cargas. Esta diferencia de comportamiento ha conducido a la clasificación de las prótesis parciales removibles con características rígidas o resilientes. El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar la deformación de diferentes sistemas de ataches extracoronarios y determinar mediante el análisis de Strain Gauge, las cargas que cada sistema ocasiona sobre los elementos pilares más distales que llevan dichos aditamentos. Se confeccionó un modelo experimental de maxilar superior parcialmente desdentado Clase I de Kennedy para medir la deformación que se produce en los elementos dentarios más distales.Se analizaron tres ataches extracoronarios de precisión: Rod Attachment (RA), Strategy (S), y Anker System (AS) para determinar y comparar su comportamiento en desdentados bilaterales posteriores (clase I de Kennedy) en maxilar superior. Los resultados se analizaron estadísticamente y mostraron que a la deformación y ante una carga de 10 daN (decaNewton), AnkerSystem presentó menos deformación en los elementos distales portadores de dichos aditamentos mientras que Rod Attachment presentó los valores más elevados. Facultad de Odontología 2020-08-21 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/30007 Revista de la Facultad de Odontología; Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2020): VOL 30 NUM 2 AÑO 2020; 9-17 2545-7594 0325-1071 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/30007/30770 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/30007/30771 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-335
container_title_str Revista de la Facultad de Odontología
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Prótesis, Parcial, Removible, Ataches, Deformación, Strain Gauge
spellingShingle Prótesis, Parcial, Removible, Ataches, Deformación, Strain Gauge
Dib et al
Comparative analysis of different precision retainer systems: part 2
topic_facet Prótesis, Parcial, Removible, Ataches, Deformación, Strain Gauge
author Dib et al
author_facet Dib et al
author_sort Dib et al
title Comparative analysis of different precision retainer systems: part 2
title_short Comparative analysis of different precision retainer systems: part 2
title_full Comparative analysis of different precision retainer systems: part 2
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of different precision retainer systems: part 2
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of different precision retainer systems: part 2
title_sort comparative analysis of different precision retainer systems: part 2
description The presence of a free end a removable partial dentures involves a major problem in the clinic. In fact, it is known that there is difficulty in treating multiplying by 2.5 the risk of complications. The gaps without posterior abutment are difficult to restore later, require a support tooth and mucosa. The oral mucosa and the ligament periodontal of the abutments teeth respond differently to the loads. This difference in behavior of teeth and mucosa is what has led to the design of removable partial dentures to be rigid or resilient characteristics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the deformation of different extra coronary attachments systems; and to determine through strain gauge analysis the loads that each system causes on the most distal pillar elements that these attachments carry. An experimental model of the partially edentulous upper maxilla of Kennedy class I was constructed to measure the deformation that occurs in the most distal dental elements. Three extra coronary precision attachments were analyzed: rod attachment (RA), strategy (SA), and Anker system (AS) to determine and compare their behavior in later bilateral teeth (Kennedy class I) in the upper jaw. The results showed that at the deformation and at a load of 10 dan (decanewton), AS attachments presented, less deformation in the distal elements carrying said attachments while RA presented the highest values.
publisher Facultad de Odontología
publishDate 2020
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/30007
work_keys_str_mv AT dibetal comparativeanalysisofdifferentprecisionretainersystemspart2
AT dibetal analisiscomparativodediferentessistemasderetenedoresdeprecisionparte2
first_indexed 2024-09-03T21:16:18Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T21:16:18Z
_version_ 1809211120808886272

Ejemplares similares