The "Thomas" case and two aspects of procedural legitimacy: The right to legality and legislators

On June 15, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in the "Thomas" case. National Congressman Enrique Thomas initiated an amparo action against the National State, stating that his rights as a legislator had been violated in the process of sanctioning Law 26.522 (known as the "media law")...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cafferata, Santiago Díaz
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Derecho 2010
Materias:
El caso “Thomas”
legitimación procesal
legalidad
The "Thomas" case
procedural legitimacy
legality
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5884
Aporte de:
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R353-article-5884
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R353-article-58842019-03-27T13:32:23Z The "Thomas" case and two aspects of procedural legitimacy: The right to legality and legislators El caso “Thomas” y dos aspectos de la legitimación procesal: El derecho a la legalidad y los legisladores Cafferata, Santiago Díaz El caso “Thomas” legitimación procesal legalidad The "Thomas" case procedural legitimacy legality On June 15, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in the "Thomas" case. National Congressman Enrique Thomas initiated an amparo action against the National State, stating that his rights as a legislator had been violated in the process of sanctioning Law 26.522 (known as the "media law"), since such a process would have been "irregular". El 15 de junio de 2010 la Corte Suprema dictó resolución en la causa “Thomas”. El diputado nacional Enrique Thomas inició una acción de amparo contra el Estado Nacional, señalando que se habrían conculcado sus derechos como legislador en el trámite de sanción de la ley 26.522 (conocida como la “ley de medios”), ya que tal trámite habría sido “irregular”. Facultad de Derecho 2010-04-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5884 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2010): Nueva Serie II 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5884/6757 Derechos de autor 2010 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-353
container_title_str Revista de la Facultad de Derecho
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic El caso “Thomas”
legitimación procesal
legalidad
The "Thomas" case
procedural legitimacy
legality
spellingShingle El caso “Thomas”
legitimación procesal
legalidad
The "Thomas" case
procedural legitimacy
legality
Cafferata, Santiago Díaz
The "Thomas" case and two aspects of procedural legitimacy: The right to legality and legislators
topic_facet El caso “Thomas”
legitimación procesal
legalidad
The "Thomas" case
procedural legitimacy
legality
author Cafferata, Santiago Díaz
author_facet Cafferata, Santiago Díaz
author_sort Cafferata, Santiago Díaz
title The "Thomas" case and two aspects of procedural legitimacy: The right to legality and legislators
title_short The "Thomas" case and two aspects of procedural legitimacy: The right to legality and legislators
title_full The "Thomas" case and two aspects of procedural legitimacy: The right to legality and legislators
title_fullStr The "Thomas" case and two aspects of procedural legitimacy: The right to legality and legislators
title_full_unstemmed The "Thomas" case and two aspects of procedural legitimacy: The right to legality and legislators
title_sort "thomas" case and two aspects of procedural legitimacy: the right to legality and legislators
description On June 15, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in the "Thomas" case. National Congressman Enrique Thomas initiated an amparo action against the National State, stating that his rights as a legislator had been violated in the process of sanctioning Law 26.522 (known as the "media law"), since such a process would have been "irregular".
publisher Facultad de Derecho
publishDate 2010
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5884
work_keys_str_mv AT cafferatasantiagodiaz thethomascaseandtwoaspectsofprocedurallegitimacytherighttolegalityandlegislators
AT cafferatasantiagodiaz elcasothomasydosaspectosdelalegitimacionprocesalelderechoalalegalidadyloslegisladores
AT cafferatasantiagodiaz thomascaseandtwoaspectsofprocedurallegitimacytherighttolegalityandlegislators
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:18:33Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:18:33Z
_version_ 1809215036842835968

Ejemplares similares