The agro-political-economic arrangements institutionalized by extractivisms and neoextractivisms: reflections about the case of the flexbilization of brazilian legislation (1999-2019)
Latin America has a long history of exploration, based on the last decades, mainly, of its goods and natural resources, through the export of agricultural and biofuel commodities. It is from this assumption that part of the analysis of extractivism and new extractivisms or neoxtrativisms to identify...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública (IIFAP-FCS-UNC)
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/30539 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Latin America has a long history of exploration, based on the last decades, mainly, of its goods and natural resources, through the export of agricultural and biofuel commodities. It is from this assumption that part of the analysis of extractivism and new extractivisms or neoxtrativisms to identify how the idea of exploitation of Brazilian natural resources is reflected in the search for flexibility in its legislation regarding pesticides and the like, with the adoption of the Bill nº 6.299/02, better known as “PL of the Poison” or “Pack of the Poison”. Therefore, the objective of the article seeks to demonstrate how extractive processes are rooted in Brazilian agricultural culture, which, due to this context of global dependence, intensifies production through monocultures and reinforces the use of agrochemicals, a factor that directly reflects in the legislation on the subject. This production model, however, is carried out at the expense of the country's human and environmental cost. Thus, the present work is eminently qualitative, through the deductive approach. Documentary technique and bibliographic review are used for data analysis. Through the results of the research, it is possible to observe several institutional arrangements, which allow the deepening of extractive practices and the flexibility of Brazilian legislation. It can be seen that the legislative apparatus is arranged in such a way as to allow and contribute to agro-strategies. The permissiveness of the Brazilian State contributes to the worsening of social and environmental issues. |
|---|