Justice and Passion. Discourses in Dispute for the Democratization of the Judiciary in Argentina

This paper analyzes strategies of the civil association Justicia Legítima at the moment of its emergence, from a theoretical-methodological perspective that combines sociology and discourse analysis, propossed by Mozejko and Costa (2001, 2002, 2007, 2009, 2015). At the end of 2012, a new debate on j...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Weckesser, Cintia
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades 2019
Materias:
discourses
strategies
justice
passions
democracy
discursos
estrategias
justicia
pasiones
democracia
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/24851
Aporte de:
Recial de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R377-article-24851
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R377-article-248512025-11-30T15:31:11Z Justice and Passion. Discourses in Dispute for the Democratization of the Judiciary in Argentina Justicia y pasión. Discursos en disputa por la democratización del Poder Judicial en Argentina Weckesser, Cintia discourses strategies justice passions democracy discursos estrategias justicia pasiones democracia This paper analyzes strategies of the civil association Justicia Legítima at the moment of its emergence, from a theoretical-methodological perspective that combines sociology and discourse analysis, propossed by Mozejko and Costa (2001, 2002, 2007, 2009, 2015). At the end of 2012, a new debate on justice in Argentina was installed in a process of great media visibility, in which Justicia Legítima got public notoriety and showed affinity to the central government, promoting public debate on judicial reform. We start from the assumption that the strategies of this agent combines the configuration of a legitimate enunciator, the construction of a legitimate problem and a particular recipient who goes through different passional states; and that such strategies are understandable in particular social conditions in which this collective social agent was configured. The analysis showed that the social agent constructed an enunciator that assumed the political condition of the judicial function. At the same time, the social agent constructed an enunciatee capable of being part of the transformation process to which he was summoned. Este trabajo analiza estrategias de la asociación civil Justicia Legítima en el momento de su surgimiento, desde una perspectiva teórica-metodológica que articula herramientas de la sociología y del análisis del discurso que articularon Mozejko y Costa (2001, 2002, 2007, 2009, 2015). A fines de 2012 se instaló un nuevo debate sobre la justicia en Argentina en un proceso de gran visibilidad mediática en el cual comenzó a articularse y a cobrar notoriedad pública la asociación civil Justicia Legítima, con afinidad al gobierno central y haciendo propio el objetivo de promover el debate para una reforma judicial. Partimos del supuesto de que las estrategias de este agente se articulan con la configuración de un enunciador legítimo, la construcción de un problema legítimo y de un destinatario particular al cual se buscó apasionar; y que tales estrategias resultan comprensibles en el marco del particular espacio de posibles en el que este agente social colectivo se configuró. En el análisis, advertimos que el agente social se configura asumiendo la condición política de la función judicial y, al mismo tiempo, construye a un enunciatario susceptible de formar parte del proceso de transformación al cual lo convoca. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades 2019-07-04 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/24851 10.53971/2718.658x.v10.n15.24851 Recial; Vol. 10 Núm. 15 (2019): Dossier: Paisajes: naturaleza y cultura en la literatura latinoamericana (siglos XIX y XX) 2718-658X 1853-4112 10.53971/2718.658x.v10.n15 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/24851/24099 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/24851/html Derechos de autor 2019 Recial https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-377
container_title_str Recial
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic discourses
strategies
justice
passions
democracy
discursos
estrategias
justicia
pasiones
democracia
spellingShingle discourses
strategies
justice
passions
democracy
discursos
estrategias
justicia
pasiones
democracia
Weckesser, Cintia
Justice and Passion. Discourses in Dispute for the Democratization of the Judiciary in Argentina
topic_facet discourses
strategies
justice
passions
democracy
discursos
estrategias
justicia
pasiones
democracia
author Weckesser, Cintia
author_facet Weckesser, Cintia
author_sort Weckesser, Cintia
title Justice and Passion. Discourses in Dispute for the Democratization of the Judiciary in Argentina
title_short Justice and Passion. Discourses in Dispute for the Democratization of the Judiciary in Argentina
title_full Justice and Passion. Discourses in Dispute for the Democratization of the Judiciary in Argentina
title_fullStr Justice and Passion. Discourses in Dispute for the Democratization of the Judiciary in Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Justice and Passion. Discourses in Dispute for the Democratization of the Judiciary in Argentina
title_sort justice and passion. discourses in dispute for the democratization of the judiciary in argentina
description This paper analyzes strategies of the civil association Justicia Legítima at the moment of its emergence, from a theoretical-methodological perspective that combines sociology and discourse analysis, propossed by Mozejko and Costa (2001, 2002, 2007, 2009, 2015). At the end of 2012, a new debate on justice in Argentina was installed in a process of great media visibility, in which Justicia Legítima got public notoriety and showed affinity to the central government, promoting public debate on judicial reform. We start from the assumption that the strategies of this agent combines the configuration of a legitimate enunciator, the construction of a legitimate problem and a particular recipient who goes through different passional states; and that such strategies are understandable in particular social conditions in which this collective social agent was configured. The analysis showed that the social agent constructed an enunciator that assumed the political condition of the judicial function. At the same time, the social agent constructed an enunciatee capable of being part of the transformation process to which he was summoned.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
publishDate 2019
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/24851
work_keys_str_mv AT weckessercintia justiceandpassiondiscoursesindisputeforthedemocratizationofthejudiciaryinargentina
AT weckessercintia justiciaypasiondiscursosendisputaporlademocratizaciondelpoderjudicialenargentina
first_indexed 2024-09-03T23:08:01Z
last_indexed 2025-12-27T05:09:48Z
_version_ 1852636857265815552

Ejemplares similares