Whoever says Rule of Law wants to cheat: Carl Schmitt and National Socialist legal antipositivism (1934-1936)

This paper studies the National Socialist debate on the rule of law by way of using the work of Carl Schmitt between 1934 and 1936 as a witness case. We will see that not a few of those who repudiate Carl Schmitt for his collaboration with National Socialism share not only his theory of law at the t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rosler, Andrés
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Grupo Prohistoria 2023
Materias:
Carlos Schmitt
Estado de Direito
Socialismo nacional
Antipositivismo Jurídico
Carl Schmitt
Estado de Derecho
Nacionalsocialismo
Rule of Law
National Socialism
Legal Antipositivism
Acceso en línea:https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1854
Aporte de:
Prohistoria. Historia, políticas de la historia (CONICET) de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R238-article-1854
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R238-article-18542023-12-28T17:19:50Z Whoever says Rule of Law wants to cheat: Carl Schmitt and National Socialist legal antipositivism (1934-1936) Quien dice Estado de derecho quiere engañar: Carl Schmitt y el antipositivismo jurídico nacionalsocialista (1934-1936) Quem diz que o Estado de direito significa enganar: Carl Schmitt e o antipositivismo jurídico nacional-socialista (1934-1936) Rosler, Andrés Carlos Schmitt Estado de Direito Socialismo nacional Antipositivismo Jurídico Carl Schmitt Estado de Derecho Nacionalsocialismo Antipositivismo Jurídico Carl Schmitt Rule of Law National Socialism Legal Antipositivism This paper studies the National Socialist debate on the rule of law by way of using the work of Carl Schmitt between 1934 and 1936 as a witness case. We will see that not a few of those who repudiate Carl Schmitt for his collaboration with National Socialism share not only his theory of law at the time, but particularly his defence of a conception of the rule of law that violates the fundamental rights of defendants. At the same time, these considerations will help us understand that the debate on the rule of law is more alive than ever.   Este trabajo estudia la discusión nacionalsocialista sobre el Estado de derecho usando como caso testigo la obra de Carl Schmitt correspondiente al período entre 1934 y 1936. De esta forma veremos que no pocos de los que repudian a Carl Schmitt por su colaboración con el nacionalsocialismo comparten no sólo su teoría del derecho en esa época, sino particularmente su defensa de un Estado del derecho que viola los derechos fundamentales de los acusados. A la vez, estas consideraciones nos permitirán apreciar que el debate sobre el Estado de derecho está más vivo que nunca. Este trabalho estuda a discussão nacional-socialista sobre o Estado de Direito usando como caso testemunha o trabalho de Carl Schmitt correspondente ao período entre 1934 e 1936. Desta forma veremos que não são poucos aqueles que repudiam Carl Schmitt por sua colaboração com o Nacional-Socialismo não partilham não só a sua teoria do direito da época, mas particularmente a sua defesa de um Estado de direito que viola os direitos fundamentais dos acusados. Ao mesmo tempo, estas considerações permitir-nos-ão compreender que o debate sobre o Estado de direito está mais vivo do que nunca. Grupo Prohistoria 2023-12-28 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html application/zip https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1854 10.35305/prohistoria.vi40.1854 Prohistoria. Historia, políticas de la historia; No. 40 (2023); 1-36 Prohistoria. Historia, políticas de la historia; Núm. 40 (2023); 1-36 Prohistoria. Historia, políticas de la historia; n. 40 (2023); 1-36 1851-9504 1514-0032 spa https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1854/2856 https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1854/2857 https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1854/2858 Derechos de autor 2023 Andrés Rosler https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-238
container_title_str Prohistoria. Historia, políticas de la historia (CONICET)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Carlos Schmitt
Estado de Direito
Socialismo nacional
Antipositivismo Jurídico
Carl Schmitt
Estado de Derecho
Nacionalsocialismo
Antipositivismo Jurídico
Carl Schmitt
Rule of Law
National Socialism
Legal Antipositivism
spellingShingle Carlos Schmitt
Estado de Direito
Socialismo nacional
Antipositivismo Jurídico
Carl Schmitt
Estado de Derecho
Nacionalsocialismo
Antipositivismo Jurídico
Carl Schmitt
Rule of Law
National Socialism
Legal Antipositivism
Rosler, Andrés
Whoever says Rule of Law wants to cheat: Carl Schmitt and National Socialist legal antipositivism (1934-1936)
topic_facet Carlos Schmitt
Estado de Direito
Socialismo nacional
Antipositivismo Jurídico
Carl Schmitt
Estado de Derecho
Nacionalsocialismo
Antipositivismo Jurídico
Carl Schmitt
Rule of Law
National Socialism
Legal Antipositivism
author Rosler, Andrés
author_facet Rosler, Andrés
author_sort Rosler, Andrés
title Whoever says Rule of Law wants to cheat: Carl Schmitt and National Socialist legal antipositivism (1934-1936)
title_short Whoever says Rule of Law wants to cheat: Carl Schmitt and National Socialist legal antipositivism (1934-1936)
title_full Whoever says Rule of Law wants to cheat: Carl Schmitt and National Socialist legal antipositivism (1934-1936)
title_fullStr Whoever says Rule of Law wants to cheat: Carl Schmitt and National Socialist legal antipositivism (1934-1936)
title_full_unstemmed Whoever says Rule of Law wants to cheat: Carl Schmitt and National Socialist legal antipositivism (1934-1936)
title_sort whoever says rule of law wants to cheat: carl schmitt and national socialist legal antipositivism (1934-1936)
description This paper studies the National Socialist debate on the rule of law by way of using the work of Carl Schmitt between 1934 and 1936 as a witness case. We will see that not a few of those who repudiate Carl Schmitt for his collaboration with National Socialism share not only his theory of law at the time, but particularly his defence of a conception of the rule of law that violates the fundamental rights of defendants. At the same time, these considerations will help us understand that the debate on the rule of law is more alive than ever.  
publisher Grupo Prohistoria
publishDate 2023
url https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1854
work_keys_str_mv AT roslerandres whoeversaysruleoflawwantstocheatcarlschmittandnationalsocialistlegalantipositivism19341936
AT roslerandres quiendiceestadodederechoquiereenganarcarlschmittyelantipositivismojuridiconacionalsocialista19341936
AT roslerandres quemdizqueoestadodedireitosignificaenganarcarlschmitteoantipositivismojuridiconacionalsocialista19341936
first_indexed 2024-08-12T21:47:49Z
last_indexed 2024-08-12T21:47:49Z
_version_ 1807219970303590400

Ejemplares similares