Caracterización palinológica de las mieles del valle inferior del Río Chubut (Argentina)

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

Thirty two samples of honeys from the lower valley of the Chubut River were analyzed. Most samples contained less than 2000 grains/g. Honeys were classified as Tamarix galilea (14 samples), Eucalyptus type (1 sample), Medicago sativa (1 sample) and mixed honey (16 samples). Pollen types were identif...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forcone, Alicia, Tellería, María Cristina
Formato: Articulo
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: 1998
Materias:
Ciencias Naturales
Pollen
Honey
Honeybees
Patagonia
Polen
Miel
Abejas melíferas
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/110895
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-110895
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Español
topic Ciencias Naturales
Pollen
Honey
Honeybees
Patagonia
Polen
Miel
Abejas melíferas
spellingShingle Ciencias Naturales
Pollen
Honey
Honeybees
Patagonia
Polen
Miel
Abejas melíferas
Forcone, Alicia
Tellería, María Cristina
Caracterización palinológica de las mieles del valle inferior del Río Chubut (Argentina)
topic_facet Ciencias Naturales
Pollen
Honey
Honeybees
Patagonia
Polen
Miel
Abejas melíferas
description Thirty two samples of honeys from the lower valley of the Chubut River were analyzed. Most samples contained less than 2000 grains/g. Honeys were classified as Tamarix galilea (14 samples), Eucalyptus type (1 sample), Medicago sativa (1 sample) and mixed honey (16 samples). Pollen types were identified using a collection of reference pollen slides. Both the pollen from honeys and the pollen from de reference material were subjected to acetolysis. The most important source of néctar in the lower valley of Chubut River honeys is Tamarix galilea, but the importance of Medicago sativa, in spite of its low intra-sample ffequence, is also discussed. Asteraceae and Fabaceae are the best represented families followed by Brassicaceae. Pollen of the native vegetation was well represented and allowed to differentiate these honeys from others in Argentina.
format Articulo
Articulo
author Forcone, Alicia
Tellería, María Cristina
author_facet Forcone, Alicia
Tellería, María Cristina
author_sort Forcone, Alicia
title Caracterización palinológica de las mieles del valle inferior del Río Chubut (Argentina)
title_short Caracterización palinológica de las mieles del valle inferior del Río Chubut (Argentina)
title_full Caracterización palinológica de las mieles del valle inferior del Río Chubut (Argentina)
title_fullStr Caracterización palinológica de las mieles del valle inferior del Río Chubut (Argentina)
title_full_unstemmed Caracterización palinológica de las mieles del valle inferior del Río Chubut (Argentina)
title_sort caracterización palinológica de las mieles del valle inferior del río chubut (argentina)
publishDate 1998
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/110895
work_keys_str_mv AT forconealicia caracterizacionpalinologicadelasmielesdelvalleinferiordelriochubutargentina
AT telleriamariacristina caracterizacionpalinologicadelasmielesdelvalleinferiordelriochubutargentina
AT forconealicia palynologicalcharacterizationofhoneysfromthelowervalleyofthechubutriverargentina
AT telleriamariacristina palynologicalcharacterizationofhoneysfromthelowervalleyofthechubutriverargentina
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820444974678018

Ejemplares similares