Does centralization imply better targeting?: evaluating emergency employment programs in Chile

This paper develops direct tests for evaluating the performance of two types of emergency employment programs put in place in Chile since 1999. Our results suggest: First, decentralized and market-driven programs (subsidies for hiring and training) are more efficient in terms of productivity, but ar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chumacero, Rómulo A., Paredes M., Ricardo
Formato: Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/3720
http://www.depeco.econo.unlp.edu.ar/reunion_desigualdad/trabajo2.pdf
Aporte de:
id I19-R120-10915-3720
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Económicas
employment programs; targeting; propensity score matching
Chile
economía
JEL: C25, J45, J64, H31, H32
empleo
descentralización
spellingShingle Ciencias Económicas
employment programs; targeting; propensity score matching
Chile
economía
JEL: C25, J45, J64, H31, H32
empleo
descentralización
Chumacero, Rómulo A.
Paredes M., Ricardo
Does centralization imply better targeting?: evaluating emergency employment programs in Chile
topic_facet Ciencias Económicas
employment programs; targeting; propensity score matching
Chile
economía
JEL: C25, J45, J64, H31, H32
empleo
descentralización
description This paper develops direct tests for evaluating the performance of two types of emergency employment programs put in place in Chile since 1999. Our results suggest: First, decentralized and market-driven programs (subsidies for hiring and training) are more efficient in terms of productivity, but are targeted to people that are less vulnerable to unemployment. Second, direct employment programs result in moderate increases of the income of the households of the participants. This increase may be outweighted by the costs (in present value) associated with higher school drop-out and participation rates. Third, if analyzed at a municipality level (comuna), centralized programs do not target municipalities with higher unemployment, increased vulnerability to unemployment, or even lower median income levels, but are strongly correlated with the political affiliation of its major. Finally, our results suggest that the population targeted in direct employment programs is not more vulnerable to unemployment than the actually unemployed.
format Objeto de conferencia
Objeto de conferencia
author Chumacero, Rómulo A.
Paredes M., Ricardo
author_facet Chumacero, Rómulo A.
Paredes M., Ricardo
author_sort Chumacero, Rómulo A.
title Does centralization imply better targeting?: evaluating emergency employment programs in Chile
title_short Does centralization imply better targeting?: evaluating emergency employment programs in Chile
title_full Does centralization imply better targeting?: evaluating emergency employment programs in Chile
title_fullStr Does centralization imply better targeting?: evaluating emergency employment programs in Chile
title_full_unstemmed Does centralization imply better targeting?: evaluating emergency employment programs in Chile
title_sort does centralization imply better targeting?: evaluating emergency employment programs in chile
publishDate 2003
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/3720
http://www.depeco.econo.unlp.edu.ar/reunion_desigualdad/trabajo2.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT chumaceroromuloa doescentralizationimplybettertargetingevaluatingemergencyemploymentprogramsinchile
AT paredesmricardo doescentralizationimplybettertargetingevaluatingemergencyemploymentprogramsinchile
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820472565858309