Revisiting the «accumulation/legitimation contradiction» approach. Reflections on the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas

This article explores and systematizes the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas regarding the relations between State and capital. Their theoretical reflections in this field were motivated by the “Atlantic Fordism” crisis and the Welfare States between the late sixties an...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pérez Roig, Diego
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional del Comahue 2024
Materias:
Estado
Capital
Acumulación
Legitimación
State
Accumulation
Legitimation
Acceso en línea:https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/revistadelafacultad/article/view/5735
Aporte de:
Repositorio de Revistas Electrónicas REVELE (UNComahue) de Universidad Nacional del Comahue
id I22-R128-article-5735
record_format ojs
spelling I22-R128-article-57352024-12-20T17:46:05Z Revisiting the «accumulation/legitimation contradiction» approach. Reflections on the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas Una recuperación del enfoque de la «contradicción acumulación/legitimación» a partir de las contribuciones de James O’Connor, Claus Offe y Jürgen Habermas Pérez Roig, Diego Estado Capital Acumulación Legitimación State Capital Accumulation Legitimation This article explores and systematizes the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas regarding the relations between State and capital. Their theoretical reflections in this field were motivated by the “Atlantic Fordism” crisis and the Welfare States between the late sixties and mid-seventies. The three authors identified a contradiction between the state “functions” of accumulation and legitimation, specifying their different forms of expression. We are interested in three of them: the tendencies towards fiscal crisis, the “irrationalization” of the state apparatus and its methods of intervention, as well as the lack of meaningful motivation for action. We articulate these dimensions from a perspective of the totality, in order to build a framework of analysis that accounts for the problems of legitimation faced by several state interventions, as well as the contingencies, contradictions and limits of the public policy process. En el presente artículo exploramos y sistematizamos las contribuciones teóricas de James O’Connor, Claus Offe y Jürgen Habermas con respecto a las relaciones entre Estado y capital. Sus aportes en este campo estuvieron motivados por la crisis del “fordismo atlántico” y de los Estados de bienestar entre finales de los sesenta y mediados de los setenta. Los tres autores observaron una contradicción entre las “funciones” estatales de acumulación y legitimación, especificando sus distintas formas de expresión. Aquí nos interesamos por tres de ellas: las tendencias a la crisis fiscal, la “irracionalización” del aparato estatal y sus modalidades de intervención, así como los déficits de sentido motivante para la acción. Buscamos recuperar y articular estas dimensiones desde una perspectiva de la totalidad, a los fines de construir un esquema de análisis sensible a los problemas de legitimación que enfrentan distintos tipos de intervenciones estatales, y que a la vez aprehenda las contingencias, contradicciones y límites del proceso de la política pública. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional del Comahue 2024-12-20 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/revistadelafacultad/article/view/5735 (En)clave Comahue. Revista Patagónica de Estudios Sociales; Vol. 31 Núm. 30 (2024); 11-43 2545-6393 2545-6466 spa https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/revistadelafacultad/article/view/5735/62611 Derechos de autor 2024 Diego Pérez Roig https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional del Comahue
institution_str I-22
repository_str R-128
container_title_str Repositorio de Revistas Electrónicas REVELE (UNComahue)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Estado
Capital
Acumulación
Legitimación
State
Capital
Accumulation
Legitimation
spellingShingle Estado
Capital
Acumulación
Legitimación
State
Capital
Accumulation
Legitimation
Pérez Roig, Diego
Revisiting the «accumulation/legitimation contradiction» approach. Reflections on the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas
topic_facet Estado
Capital
Acumulación
Legitimación
State
Capital
Accumulation
Legitimation
author Pérez Roig, Diego
author_facet Pérez Roig, Diego
author_sort Pérez Roig, Diego
title Revisiting the «accumulation/legitimation contradiction» approach. Reflections on the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas
title_short Revisiting the «accumulation/legitimation contradiction» approach. Reflections on the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas
title_full Revisiting the «accumulation/legitimation contradiction» approach. Reflections on the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas
title_fullStr Revisiting the «accumulation/legitimation contradiction» approach. Reflections on the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the «accumulation/legitimation contradiction» approach. Reflections on the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas
title_sort revisiting the «accumulation/legitimation contradiction» approach. reflections on the contributions of james o’connor, claus offe and jürgen habermas
description This article explores and systematizes the contributions of James O’Connor, Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas regarding the relations between State and capital. Their theoretical reflections in this field were motivated by the “Atlantic Fordism” crisis and the Welfare States between the late sixties and mid-seventies. The three authors identified a contradiction between the state “functions” of accumulation and legitimation, specifying their different forms of expression. We are interested in three of them: the tendencies towards fiscal crisis, the “irrationalization” of the state apparatus and its methods of intervention, as well as the lack of meaningful motivation for action. We articulate these dimensions from a perspective of the totality, in order to build a framework of analysis that accounts for the problems of legitimation faced by several state interventions, as well as the contingencies, contradictions and limits of the public policy process.
publisher Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional del Comahue
publishDate 2024
url https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/revistadelafacultad/article/view/5735
work_keys_str_mv AT perezroigdiego revisitingtheaccumulationlegitimationcontradictionapproachreflectionsonthecontributionsofjamesoconnorclausoffeandjurgenhabermas
AT perezroigdiego unarecuperaciondelenfoquedelacontradiccionacumulacionlegitimacionapartirdelascontribucionesdejamesoconnorclausoffeyjurgenhabermas
first_indexed 2025-02-05T23:00:59Z
last_indexed 2025-02-05T23:00:59Z
_version_ 1823260236062916608

Ejemplares similares