The Historical Effect of Neoplatonism in the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer
In "El ánimo neoplatónico de la filosofía de Gadamer" (2016), Gutiérrez argues that Plotinus is the root of the ontological theses of Wahrheit und Methode, insofar as the unity of the being of art and language emanates in multiple representations. While previous interpreters have examined...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion Artítulo evaluado por pares |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/14116 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=14116_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I28-R145-14116_oai |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
I28-R145-14116_oai2025-11-17 Díez Fischer, Francisco 2024-03-29 In "El ánimo neoplatónico de la filosofía de Gadamer" (2016), Gutiérrez argues that Plotinus is the root of the ontological theses of Wahrheit und Methode, insofar as the unity of the being of art and language emanates in multiple representations. While previous interpreters have examined this influence on specific concepts of Gadamer, such as truth (Carpenter, 1994), inner word (Arthos, 2009), and critique of modern subjectivity (Doyon, 2012), the historical effect of the Neoplatonic tradition in Gadamer's philosophy has not been fully addressed. This study aims to deepen the analysis in two ways: 1) by extending the tradition from its inception in Plotinus to its culmination in Nicholas of Cusa; 2) by expanding its reception to other texts that elucidate its influence on Wahrheit und Methode. The hypothesis is that the entirety of this tradition influences Gadamer's hermeneutics, revealing a hidden force in the history of philosophy. To substantiate this claim, the introduction examines the reception of Plotinus and Nicholas of Cusa in the German tradition prior to Gadamer. Subsequently, it is analyzed in key texts of Gadamer (1964, 1965, 1980, 2018). Finally, its effective history is investigated in Wahrheit und Methode (1960). En “El ánimo neoplatónico de la filosofía de Gadamer” (2016) Gutiérrez sostiene que Plotino es la raíz de las tesis ontológicas de Wahrheit und Methode en tanto la unidad del ser del arte y del lenguaje emana en múltiples representaciones. Si bien intérpretes previos han examinado esta influencia en conceptos específicos de Gadamer, como el de verdad (Carpenter, 1994), palabra interior (Arthos, 2009) y crítica a la subjetividad moderna (Doyon, 2012), la eficacia histórica de la tradición neoplatónica en la filosofía gadameriana no ha sido abordada en toda su amplitud. Este estudio pretende profundizar su análisis de dos maneras: 1º) extendiendo la tradición desde su inicio en Plotino hasta su culminación en Nicolás de Cusa; 2º) ampliando su recepción a otros textos que esclarecen su influencia en Wahrheit und Methode. La hipótesis es que la totalidad de esta tradición influye en la hermenéutica de Gadamer revelando una fuerza oculta en la historia de la filosofía. Para sustentar esta afirmación, la introducción examina la recepción de Plotino y Nicolás de Cusa en la tradición alemana previa a Gadamer. Luego se analiza en textos claves de Gadamer (1964, 1965, 1980, 2018). Y finalmente se indaga su historia efectual en Wahrheit und Methode (1960). application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/14116 10.34096/petm.v45.n1.14116 spa Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/14116/13135 Patristica et Mediævalia; Vol. 45 Núm. 1 (2024); 31-50 2683-9636 Hermenéutica Neoplatonismo Gadamer Plotino Nicolás de Cusa Hermeneutics Neoplatonism Gadamer Plotinus Nicholas of Cusa The Historical Effect of Neoplatonism in the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer La eficacia histórica del neoplatonismo en la hermenéutica filosófica de Hans-Georg Gadamer info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artítulo evaluado por pares https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=14116_oai |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-145 |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) |
| language |
Español |
| orig_language_str_mv |
spa |
| topic |
Hermenéutica Neoplatonismo Gadamer Plotino Nicolás de Cusa Hermeneutics Neoplatonism Gadamer Plotinus Nicholas of Cusa |
| spellingShingle |
Hermenéutica Neoplatonismo Gadamer Plotino Nicolás de Cusa Hermeneutics Neoplatonism Gadamer Plotinus Nicholas of Cusa Díez Fischer, Francisco The Historical Effect of Neoplatonism in the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer |
| topic_facet |
Hermenéutica Neoplatonismo Gadamer Plotino Nicolás de Cusa Hermeneutics Neoplatonism Gadamer Plotinus Nicholas of Cusa |
| description |
In "El ánimo neoplatónico de la filosofía de Gadamer" (2016), Gutiérrez argues that Plotinus is the root of the ontological theses of Wahrheit und Methode, insofar as the unity of the being of art and language emanates in multiple representations. While previous interpreters have examined this influence on specific concepts of Gadamer, such as truth (Carpenter, 1994), inner word (Arthos, 2009), and critique of modern subjectivity (Doyon, 2012), the historical effect of the Neoplatonic tradition in Gadamer's philosophy has not been fully addressed. This study aims to deepen the analysis in two ways: 1) by extending the tradition from its inception in Plotinus to its culmination in Nicholas of Cusa; 2) by expanding its reception to other texts that elucidate its influence on Wahrheit und Methode. The hypothesis is that the entirety of this tradition influences Gadamer's hermeneutics, revealing a hidden force in the history of philosophy. To substantiate this claim, the introduction examines the reception of Plotinus and Nicholas of Cusa in the German tradition prior to Gadamer. Subsequently, it is analyzed in key texts of Gadamer (1964, 1965, 1980, 2018). Finally, its effective history is investigated in Wahrheit und Methode (1960). |
| format |
Artículo publishedVersion Artítulo evaluado por pares |
| author |
Díez Fischer, Francisco |
| author_facet |
Díez Fischer, Francisco |
| author_sort |
Díez Fischer, Francisco |
| title |
The Historical Effect of Neoplatonism in the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer |
| title_short |
The Historical Effect of Neoplatonism in the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer |
| title_full |
The Historical Effect of Neoplatonism in the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer |
| title_fullStr |
The Historical Effect of Neoplatonism in the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Historical Effect of Neoplatonism in the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer |
| title_sort |
historical effect of neoplatonism in the philosophical hermeneutics of hans-georg gadamer |
| publisher |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| url |
https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/14116 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=14116_oai |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT diezfischerfrancisco thehistoricaleffectofneoplatonisminthephilosophicalhermeneuticsofhansgeorggadamer AT diezfischerfrancisco laeficaciahistoricadelneoplatonismoenlahermeneuticafilosoficadehansgeorggadamer AT diezfischerfrancisco historicaleffectofneoplatonisminthephilosophicalhermeneuticsofhansgeorggadamer |
| _version_ |
1851375444278902784 |