Dogma under the suspect in the Libro del buen amor
The polysemic structure of El libro de buen amor presents a tension between “that which is” and “that which should be” of the everyday life that fails to be eased throughout the book's pages. The issue regarding the meaning of the book, the enlightening of the complex relation between surface a...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/AcHAM/article/view/2667 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=medieval&d=2667_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I28-R145-2667_oai |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
I28-R145-2667_oai2025-11-17 Chicote, Gloria B. 2016-09-25 The polysemic structure of El libro de buen amor presents a tension between “that which is” and “that which should be” of the everyday life that fails to be eased throughout the book's pages. The issue regarding the meaning of the book, the enlightening of the complex relation between surface and underlying contents, cannot be fruitfully engaged without taking into account a series of debates within Christianism that confronted dogmatic orthodoxes with Aristotelian heterodoxes during the XIIIth and XIVth Centuries. The ambiguity of the text proves how difficult it was for the author to express his dissidences. It's parody, the way he chose to overcome such difficulties. La polisemia estructurante del Libro de buen amor denota una tensión entre “el deber” y “el ser” cotidiano que no termina de resolverse a lo largo de sus páginas. El interrogante sobre el sentido del libro, el esclarecimiento entre la literalidad de la corteza y el mensaje oculto en el meollo no puede ser abordado sin tener en consideración los debates en curso que se estaban desarrollando a lo largo de los siglos XIII y XIV en el interior del cristianismo, representados por los dogmáticos ortodoxos y los aristotélicos heterodoxos. La ambigüedad del discurso es la clave que nos permite constatar la dificultad que el autor tuvo para manifestar sus disidencias y la utilización que efectuó de la parodia para zanjar la dificultad. application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/AcHAM/article/view/2667 10.34096/aciham.v6.2667 spa Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/AcHAM/article/view/2667/2303 Actas y comunicaciones del Instituto de Historia Antigua y Medieval; Vol. 6 (2010) 1669-7286 Libro de buen amor Aristotelianism Orthodoxy Heterodoxy 14th Century Libro de buen amor aristotelismo ortodoxia heterodoxia siglo XIV Dogma under the suspect in the Libro del buen amor El dogma bajo sospecha en el Libro de buen amor info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=medieval&d=2667_oai |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-145 |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) |
| language |
Español |
| orig_language_str_mv |
spa |
| topic |
Libro de buen amor Aristotelianism Orthodoxy Heterodoxy 14th Century Libro de buen amor aristotelismo ortodoxia heterodoxia siglo XIV |
| spellingShingle |
Libro de buen amor Aristotelianism Orthodoxy Heterodoxy 14th Century Libro de buen amor aristotelismo ortodoxia heterodoxia siglo XIV Chicote, Gloria B. Dogma under the suspect in the Libro del buen amor |
| topic_facet |
Libro de buen amor Aristotelianism Orthodoxy Heterodoxy 14th Century Libro de buen amor aristotelismo ortodoxia heterodoxia siglo XIV |
| description |
The polysemic structure of El libro de buen amor presents a tension between “that which is” and “that which should be” of the everyday life that fails to be eased throughout the book's pages. The issue regarding the meaning of the book, the enlightening of the complex relation between surface and underlying contents, cannot be fruitfully engaged without taking into account a series of debates within Christianism that confronted dogmatic orthodoxes with Aristotelian heterodoxes during the XIIIth and XIVth Centuries. The ambiguity of the text proves how difficult it was for the author to express his dissidences. It's parody, the way he chose to overcome such difficulties. |
| format |
Artículo publishedVersion |
| author |
Chicote, Gloria B. |
| author_facet |
Chicote, Gloria B. |
| author_sort |
Chicote, Gloria B. |
| title |
Dogma under the suspect in the Libro del buen amor |
| title_short |
Dogma under the suspect in the Libro del buen amor |
| title_full |
Dogma under the suspect in the Libro del buen amor |
| title_fullStr |
Dogma under the suspect in the Libro del buen amor |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Dogma under the suspect in the Libro del buen amor |
| title_sort |
dogma under the suspect in the libro del buen amor |
| publisher |
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/AcHAM/article/view/2667 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=medieval&d=2667_oai |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT chicotegloriab dogmaunderthesuspectinthelibrodelbuenamor AT chicotegloriab eldogmabajosospechaenellibrodebuenamor |
| _version_ |
1857043171368763392 |