Derecho constitucional del ciudadano y derecho constitucional del poder del Estado
"The text constitutes the basis for the oral examination held on December 3, 2008, within the framework of the competition to fill a part-time Full Professor position in the subject Elements of Constitutional Law, Department of Public Law, file 601.981/2003, Faculty of Law, University of Buenos...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.derecho.uba.ar/index.php/academia/article/view/711/621 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=academia&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3493 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/academia/index/assoc/HWA_3493.dir/3493.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | "The text constitutes the basis for the oral examination held on December 3, 2008, within the framework of the competition to fill a part-time Full Professor position in the subject Elements of Constitutional Law, Department of Public Law, file 601.981/2003, Faculty of Law, University of Buenos Aires. The jury, composed of Professors Luis Aguiar de Luque, Antonio Torres del Moral, and Robert Barker, awarded the author first place in the overall evaluation of prior merits, the examination, and the personal interview, and therefore recommended him for the position. Although it is common practice in other parts of the world, due to the inherent characteristics of competitions at the University of Buenos Aires, the texts of oral examinations are not published for various reasons, one of them, perhaps the main one, being that oral presentations are not recorded in paper, audio, or video format. In this case, the written work preceded the oral presentation; to put it more clearly Still: The topics were published at the suggestion of the international jury members in November 2008. After choosing one, the candidate prepared a written account for reflection and subsequent presentation. Needless to say, the oral examination was not read aloud. Today, its publication has been deemed worthwhile; some reformulated statements are included, thanks to the revisions facilitated by the objections and/or questions of the jury members. The jury established approximately 20 topics. The one chosen by the author was: Among the constitutional guarantees of a structural nature (separation of powers, checks and balances, federalism, etc.) and the constitutional guarantees of individual rights: which do you consider to be the most important for the defense of liberty? The citations of authors are presented as they were introduced in the oral presentation; now, they are only noted in footnotes, and at the end of the work, in section § VI, Sources, the work and the page numbers where the citation appears are listed in greater detail. The statement, declaration, or concept of the cited author, or of those not cited but consulted, is included. This does not alter the usual method of recording bibliographic references. It simply maintains fidelity to the structure of the oral presentation. Section VII also includes: a) the research guidelines and course direction, and b) the teaching programs, as presented to the Jury.." |
|---|