Conflicting identities: Medea of Euripides in two Argentine tragedies

Two Argentine authors interrelate through the reception of the myth of Medea. Beyond the times in which their works circumscribe, both converge particularly in the otherness of their protagonists, traversed by the violence that exudes from the territory occupied by two conflictive identities. In La...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Delbueno, María Silvina
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Facultad de Humandiades. Instituto de Letras 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/clt/article/view/5988
Aporte de:
id I48-R154-article-5988
record_format ojs
spelling I48-R154-article-59882023-08-02T15:30:30Z Conflicting identities: Medea of Euripides in two Argentine tragedies Identidades en conflicto: Medea de Eurípides en dos tragedias argentinas Delbueno, María Silvina Medea classical reception Argentina conflicting identities Medea recepción clásica Argentina identidades conflictivas Two Argentine authors interrelate through the reception of the myth of Medea. Beyond the times in which their works circumscribe, both converge particularly in the otherness of their protagonists, traversed by the violence that exudes from the territory occupied by two conflictive identities. In La frontera (1964), Cureses has wanted to dialogue with the Greek idiosyncrasy from the Argentine dimension of la pampa and from the reality of the Conquest of the desert. While in La hechicera (1997), Alves formulated the recreation of a regional historical incident based on the accusation of sorcery against a native woman during the times of the Inquisiton in Colonial Tucumán. An impassable line provokes the conflicts that delimit the ones and the others, between the inhabitants of Colchis and the ones of Corinth, between whites and indigenous people, between Christians and heretics. Dos autores argentinos se interrelacionan a través de la recepción del mito de Medea. Más allá de los tiempos en los que se circunscriben sus obras, ambos confluyen particularmente en la otredad de sus protagonistas, atravesadas por la violencia que emana del territorio ocupado por dos identidades conflictivas. En La frontera (1964), Cureses ha querido dialogar con la idiosincrasia de los griegos desde la dimensión argentina de la pampa y desde la realidad de la Conquista del desierto. En tanto en La Hechicera (1997), Alves formuló la recreación de un acontecimiento histórico regional basado en la acusación contra una india por hechicería durante la época de la Inquisición en Tucumán Colonial. Una línea infranqueable provoca los conflictos que delimitan a los unos y a los otros, entre los habitantes de Cólquide y los de Corinto, entre blancos e indios, entre cristianos y herejes. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Facultad de Humandiades. Instituto de Letras 2022-07-26 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/clt/article/view/5988 10.30972/clt.0185988 Cuadernos de Literatura; Núm. 18 (2022): Julio; 18-32 2684-0499 0326-5102 spa https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/clt/article/view/5988/5691 Derechos de autor 2022 Cuadernos de Literatura
institution Universidad Nacional del Nordeste
institution_str I-48
repository_str R-154
container_title_str Revistas UNNE - Universidad Nacional del Noroeste (UNNE)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Medea
classical reception
Argentina
conflicting identities
Medea
recepción clásica
Argentina
identidades conflictivas
spellingShingle Medea
classical reception
Argentina
conflicting identities
Medea
recepción clásica
Argentina
identidades conflictivas
Delbueno, María Silvina
Conflicting identities: Medea of Euripides in two Argentine tragedies
topic_facet Medea
classical reception
Argentina
conflicting identities
Medea
recepción clásica
Argentina
identidades conflictivas
author Delbueno, María Silvina
author_facet Delbueno, María Silvina
author_sort Delbueno, María Silvina
title Conflicting identities: Medea of Euripides in two Argentine tragedies
title_short Conflicting identities: Medea of Euripides in two Argentine tragedies
title_full Conflicting identities: Medea of Euripides in two Argentine tragedies
title_fullStr Conflicting identities: Medea of Euripides in two Argentine tragedies
title_full_unstemmed Conflicting identities: Medea of Euripides in two Argentine tragedies
title_sort conflicting identities: medea of euripides in two argentine tragedies
description Two Argentine authors interrelate through the reception of the myth of Medea. Beyond the times in which their works circumscribe, both converge particularly in the otherness of their protagonists, traversed by the violence that exudes from the territory occupied by two conflictive identities. In La frontera (1964), Cureses has wanted to dialogue with the Greek idiosyncrasy from the Argentine dimension of la pampa and from the reality of the Conquest of the desert. While in La hechicera (1997), Alves formulated the recreation of a regional historical incident based on the accusation of sorcery against a native woman during the times of the Inquisiton in Colonial Tucumán. An impassable line provokes the conflicts that delimit the ones and the others, between the inhabitants of Colchis and the ones of Corinth, between whites and indigenous people, between Christians and heretics.
publisher Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Facultad de Humandiades. Instituto de Letras
publishDate 2022
url https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/clt/article/view/5988
work_keys_str_mv AT delbuenomariasilvina conflictingidentitiesmedeaofeuripidesintwoargentinetragedies
AT delbuenomariasilvina identidadesenconflictomedeadeeuripidesendostragediasargentinas
first_indexed 2022-08-19T12:07:27Z
last_indexed 2024-08-21T22:37:46Z
_version_ 1808038485863432192