Physical Processes Involved in the EUV “Surge” Event of 9 May 2012

We study an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) confined ejection observed on 9 May 2012 in Active Region (AR) NOAA 11476. For the analysis we use observations in multiple wavelengths (EUV, X-rays, Hα , and magnetograms) from a variety of ground- and space-based instruments. The magnetic configuration showed...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00380938_v293_n12_p_LopezFuentes
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00380938_v293_n12_p_LopezFuentes
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_00380938_v293_n12_p_LopezFuentes
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_00380938_v293_n12_p_LopezFuentes2023-06-08T15:02:57Z Physical Processes Involved in the EUV “Surge” Event of 9 May 2012 Active Regions, Models Flares, Relation to Magnetic Field Jets Magnetic Reconnection, Observational Signatures Surges We study an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) confined ejection observed on 9 May 2012 in Active Region (AR) NOAA 11476. For the analysis we use observations in multiple wavelengths (EUV, X-rays, Hα , and magnetograms) from a variety of ground- and space-based instruments. The magnetic configuration showed two rotating bipoles within the following polarity of the AR. This evolution was present some tens of hours before the studied event and continued thereafter. During this period, the magnetic flux of both bipoles continuously decreased. A mini-filament with a length of ≈30″ lay along the photospheric inversion line of the largest bipole. The mini-filament was observed to erupt, accompanied by an M4.7 flare (SOL20120509T12:23:00). This injected dense material as well as twist along closed loops in the form of a very broad ejection whose morphology resembled that of typical Hα surges. We conclude that the flare and eruption can be explained as due to two reconnection processes, one occurring below the erupting mini-filament, and another above it. This second process injects the mini-filament plasma within the reconnected closed loops linking the main AR polarities. By analyzing the magnetic topology using a force-free model of the coronal field, we identify the location of quasi-separatix layers, where reconnection is prone to occur, and present a detailed interpretation of the chromospheric and coronal eruption observations. In particular, this event, in contrast to what has been proposed in several models explaining surges and/or jets, is not produced by magnetic flux emergence, but by magnetic flux cancellation accompanied by the rotation of the bipoles. In fact, the conjunction of these two processes, flux cancellation and bipole rotations, is at the origin of a series of events, homologous to the event we analyze in this article, which occurred in AR 11476 from 8 to 10 May 2012. © 2018, Springer Media B.V. 2018 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00380938_v293_n12_p_LopezFuentes http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00380938_v293_n12_p_LopezFuentes
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Active Regions, Models
Flares, Relation to Magnetic Field
Jets
Magnetic Reconnection, Observational Signatures
Surges
spellingShingle Active Regions, Models
Flares, Relation to Magnetic Field
Jets
Magnetic Reconnection, Observational Signatures
Surges
Physical Processes Involved in the EUV “Surge” Event of 9 May 2012
topic_facet Active Regions, Models
Flares, Relation to Magnetic Field
Jets
Magnetic Reconnection, Observational Signatures
Surges
description We study an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) confined ejection observed on 9 May 2012 in Active Region (AR) NOAA 11476. For the analysis we use observations in multiple wavelengths (EUV, X-rays, Hα , and magnetograms) from a variety of ground- and space-based instruments. The magnetic configuration showed two rotating bipoles within the following polarity of the AR. This evolution was present some tens of hours before the studied event and continued thereafter. During this period, the magnetic flux of both bipoles continuously decreased. A mini-filament with a length of ≈30″ lay along the photospheric inversion line of the largest bipole. The mini-filament was observed to erupt, accompanied by an M4.7 flare (SOL20120509T12:23:00). This injected dense material as well as twist along closed loops in the form of a very broad ejection whose morphology resembled that of typical Hα surges. We conclude that the flare and eruption can be explained as due to two reconnection processes, one occurring below the erupting mini-filament, and another above it. This second process injects the mini-filament plasma within the reconnected closed loops linking the main AR polarities. By analyzing the magnetic topology using a force-free model of the coronal field, we identify the location of quasi-separatix layers, where reconnection is prone to occur, and present a detailed interpretation of the chromospheric and coronal eruption observations. In particular, this event, in contrast to what has been proposed in several models explaining surges and/or jets, is not produced by magnetic flux emergence, but by magnetic flux cancellation accompanied by the rotation of the bipoles. In fact, the conjunction of these two processes, flux cancellation and bipole rotations, is at the origin of a series of events, homologous to the event we analyze in this article, which occurred in AR 11476 from 8 to 10 May 2012. © 2018, Springer Media B.V.
title Physical Processes Involved in the EUV “Surge” Event of 9 May 2012
title_short Physical Processes Involved in the EUV “Surge” Event of 9 May 2012
title_full Physical Processes Involved in the EUV “Surge” Event of 9 May 2012
title_fullStr Physical Processes Involved in the EUV “Surge” Event of 9 May 2012
title_full_unstemmed Physical Processes Involved in the EUV “Surge” Event of 9 May 2012
title_sort physical processes involved in the euv “surge” event of 9 may 2012
publishDate 2018
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00380938_v293_n12_p_LopezFuentes
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00380938_v293_n12_p_LopezFuentes
_version_ 1768543743121555456