Diffraction grating efficiencies conformal mapping method for a good real conductor
The metallic diffraction grating problem has been solved for P-polarization using a conformal mapping and the surface impedance boundary condition. The method is used to calculate the electromagnetic fields diffracted by a grating having a cycloidal groove shape. The numerical results are compared w...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | JOUR |
Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00303909_v29_n11_p1459_Depine |
Aporte de: |
id |
todo:paper_00303909_v29_n11_p1459_Depine |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
todo:paper_00303909_v29_n11_p1459_Depine2023-10-03T14:39:52Z Diffraction grating efficiencies conformal mapping method for a good real conductor Depine, R.A. Simon, J.M. The metallic diffraction grating problem has been solved for P-polarization using a conformal mapping and the surface impedance boundary condition. The method is used to calculate the electromagnetic fields diffracted by a grating having a cycloidal groove shape. The numerical results are compared with those obtained using the direct differential formalism. For low conductivities the coincidence between both results is only qualitative, whereas there exists a zone for greater conductivities where the differences are smaller than 0∙005. For even greater conductivities the approximated boundary condition employed holds more exactly, but the comparison is not possible because the direct differential method involves numerical problems. © 1982 Taylor & Francis Ltd. JOUR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00303909_v29_n11_p1459_Depine |
institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
institution_str |
I-28 |
repository_str |
R-134 |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) |
description |
The metallic diffraction grating problem has been solved for P-polarization using a conformal mapping and the surface impedance boundary condition. The method is used to calculate the electromagnetic fields diffracted by a grating having a cycloidal groove shape. The numerical results are compared with those obtained using the direct differential formalism. For low conductivities the coincidence between both results is only qualitative, whereas there exists a zone for greater conductivities where the differences are smaller than 0∙005. For even greater conductivities the approximated boundary condition employed holds more exactly, but the comparison is not possible because the direct differential method involves numerical problems. © 1982 Taylor & Francis Ltd. |
format |
JOUR |
author |
Depine, R.A. Simon, J.M. |
spellingShingle |
Depine, R.A. Simon, J.M. Diffraction grating efficiencies conformal mapping method for a good real conductor |
author_facet |
Depine, R.A. Simon, J.M. |
author_sort |
Depine, R.A. |
title |
Diffraction grating efficiencies conformal mapping method for a good real conductor |
title_short |
Diffraction grating efficiencies conformal mapping method for a good real conductor |
title_full |
Diffraction grating efficiencies conformal mapping method for a good real conductor |
title_fullStr |
Diffraction grating efficiencies conformal mapping method for a good real conductor |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diffraction grating efficiencies conformal mapping method for a good real conductor |
title_sort |
diffraction grating efficiencies conformal mapping method for a good real conductor |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00303909_v29_n11_p1459_Depine |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT depinera diffractiongratingefficienciesconformalmappingmethodforagoodrealconductor AT simonjm diffractiongratingefficienciesconformalmappingmethodforagoodrealconductor |
_version_ |
1807324054147825664 |