Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data

In Computer Assisted Language Learning systems, pronunciation scoring consists in providing a score grading the overall pronunciation quality of the speech uttered by a student. In this work, a log-likelihood ratio obtained with respect to two automatic speech recognition (ASR) models was used as sc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landini, F., Ferrer, L., Franco, H., Karpov A., Mporas I., Potapova R., ASM Solutions Ltd.
Formato: SER
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03029743_v10458LNAI_n_p87_Landini
Aporte de:
id todo:paper_03029743_v10458LNAI_n_p87_Landini
record_format dspace
spelling todo:paper_03029743_v10458LNAI_n_p87_Landini2023-10-03T15:18:46Z Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data Landini, F. Ferrer, L. Franco, H. Karpov A. Mporas I. Potapova R. ASM Solutions Ltd. Computer-assisted language learning Log-likelihood ratio MAP adaptation Pronunciation scoring Computer aided instruction E-learning Grading Linguistics Automatic speech recognition Computer assisted language learning Computer assisted language learning systems Log likelihood ratio MAP adaptation Pronunciation quality Pronunciation scoring Scoring performance Speech recognition In Computer Assisted Language Learning systems, pronunciation scoring consists in providing a score grading the overall pronunciation quality of the speech uttered by a student. In this work, a log-likelihood ratio obtained with respect to two automatic speech recognition (ASR) models was used as score. One model represents native pronunciation while the other one captures non-native pronunciation. Different approaches to obtain each model and different amounts of training data were analyzed. The best results were obtained training an ASR system using a separate large corpus without pronunciation quality annotations and then adapting it to the native and non-native data, sequentially. Nevertheless, when models are trained directly on the native and non-native data, pronunciation scoring performance is similar. This is a surprising result considering that word error rates for these models are significantly worse, indicating that ASR performance is not a good predictor of pronunciation scoring performance on this system. © Springer International Publishing AG 2017. SER info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03029743_v10458LNAI_n_p87_Landini
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Computer-assisted language learning
Log-likelihood ratio
MAP adaptation
Pronunciation scoring
Computer aided instruction
E-learning
Grading
Linguistics
Automatic speech recognition
Computer assisted language learning
Computer assisted language learning systems
Log likelihood ratio
MAP adaptation
Pronunciation quality
Pronunciation scoring
Scoring performance
Speech recognition
spellingShingle Computer-assisted language learning
Log-likelihood ratio
MAP adaptation
Pronunciation scoring
Computer aided instruction
E-learning
Grading
Linguistics
Automatic speech recognition
Computer assisted language learning
Computer assisted language learning systems
Log likelihood ratio
MAP adaptation
Pronunciation quality
Pronunciation scoring
Scoring performance
Speech recognition
Landini, F.
Ferrer, L.
Franco, H.
Karpov A.
Mporas I.
Potapova R.
ASM Solutions Ltd.
Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data
topic_facet Computer-assisted language learning
Log-likelihood ratio
MAP adaptation
Pronunciation scoring
Computer aided instruction
E-learning
Grading
Linguistics
Automatic speech recognition
Computer assisted language learning
Computer assisted language learning systems
Log likelihood ratio
MAP adaptation
Pronunciation quality
Pronunciation scoring
Scoring performance
Speech recognition
description In Computer Assisted Language Learning systems, pronunciation scoring consists in providing a score grading the overall pronunciation quality of the speech uttered by a student. In this work, a log-likelihood ratio obtained with respect to two automatic speech recognition (ASR) models was used as score. One model represents native pronunciation while the other one captures non-native pronunciation. Different approaches to obtain each model and different amounts of training data were analyzed. The best results were obtained training an ASR system using a separate large corpus without pronunciation quality annotations and then adapting it to the native and non-native data, sequentially. Nevertheless, when models are trained directly on the native and non-native data, pronunciation scoring performance is similar. This is a surprising result considering that word error rates for these models are significantly worse, indicating that ASR performance is not a good predictor of pronunciation scoring performance on this system. © Springer International Publishing AG 2017.
format SER
author Landini, F.
Ferrer, L.
Franco, H.
Karpov A.
Mporas I.
Potapova R.
ASM Solutions Ltd.
author_facet Landini, F.
Ferrer, L.
Franco, H.
Karpov A.
Mporas I.
Potapova R.
ASM Solutions Ltd.
author_sort Landini, F.
title Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data
title_short Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data
title_full Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data
title_fullStr Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data
title_sort adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03029743_v10458LNAI_n_p87_Landini
work_keys_str_mv AT landinif adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata
AT ferrerl adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata
AT francoh adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata
AT karpova adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata
AT mporasi adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata
AT potapovar adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata
AT asmsolutionsltd adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata
_version_ 1807324537685016576