Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data
In Computer Assisted Language Learning systems, pronunciation scoring consists in providing a score grading the overall pronunciation quality of the speech uttered by a student. In this work, a log-likelihood ratio obtained with respect to two automatic speech recognition (ASR) models was used as sc...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | SER |
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03029743_v10458LNAI_n_p87_Landini |
Aporte de: |
id |
todo:paper_03029743_v10458LNAI_n_p87_Landini |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
todo:paper_03029743_v10458LNAI_n_p87_Landini2023-10-03T15:18:46Z Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data Landini, F. Ferrer, L. Franco, H. Karpov A. Mporas I. Potapova R. ASM Solutions Ltd. Computer-assisted language learning Log-likelihood ratio MAP adaptation Pronunciation scoring Computer aided instruction E-learning Grading Linguistics Automatic speech recognition Computer assisted language learning Computer assisted language learning systems Log likelihood ratio MAP adaptation Pronunciation quality Pronunciation scoring Scoring performance Speech recognition In Computer Assisted Language Learning systems, pronunciation scoring consists in providing a score grading the overall pronunciation quality of the speech uttered by a student. In this work, a log-likelihood ratio obtained with respect to two automatic speech recognition (ASR) models was used as score. One model represents native pronunciation while the other one captures non-native pronunciation. Different approaches to obtain each model and different amounts of training data were analyzed. The best results were obtained training an ASR system using a separate large corpus without pronunciation quality annotations and then adapting it to the native and non-native data, sequentially. Nevertheless, when models are trained directly on the native and non-native data, pronunciation scoring performance is similar. This is a surprising result considering that word error rates for these models are significantly worse, indicating that ASR performance is not a good predictor of pronunciation scoring performance on this system. © Springer International Publishing AG 2017. SER info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03029743_v10458LNAI_n_p87_Landini |
institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
institution_str |
I-28 |
repository_str |
R-134 |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) |
topic |
Computer-assisted language learning Log-likelihood ratio MAP adaptation Pronunciation scoring Computer aided instruction E-learning Grading Linguistics Automatic speech recognition Computer assisted language learning Computer assisted language learning systems Log likelihood ratio MAP adaptation Pronunciation quality Pronunciation scoring Scoring performance Speech recognition |
spellingShingle |
Computer-assisted language learning Log-likelihood ratio MAP adaptation Pronunciation scoring Computer aided instruction E-learning Grading Linguistics Automatic speech recognition Computer assisted language learning Computer assisted language learning systems Log likelihood ratio MAP adaptation Pronunciation quality Pronunciation scoring Scoring performance Speech recognition Landini, F. Ferrer, L. Franco, H. Karpov A. Mporas I. Potapova R. ASM Solutions Ltd. Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data |
topic_facet |
Computer-assisted language learning Log-likelihood ratio MAP adaptation Pronunciation scoring Computer aided instruction E-learning Grading Linguistics Automatic speech recognition Computer assisted language learning Computer assisted language learning systems Log likelihood ratio MAP adaptation Pronunciation quality Pronunciation scoring Scoring performance Speech recognition |
description |
In Computer Assisted Language Learning systems, pronunciation scoring consists in providing a score grading the overall pronunciation quality of the speech uttered by a student. In this work, a log-likelihood ratio obtained with respect to two automatic speech recognition (ASR) models was used as score. One model represents native pronunciation while the other one captures non-native pronunciation. Different approaches to obtain each model and different amounts of training data were analyzed. The best results were obtained training an ASR system using a separate large corpus without pronunciation quality annotations and then adapting it to the native and non-native data, sequentially. Nevertheless, when models are trained directly on the native and non-native data, pronunciation scoring performance is similar. This is a surprising result considering that word error rates for these models are significantly worse, indicating that ASR performance is not a good predictor of pronunciation scoring performance on this system. © Springer International Publishing AG 2017. |
format |
SER |
author |
Landini, F. Ferrer, L. Franco, H. Karpov A. Mporas I. Potapova R. ASM Solutions Ltd. |
author_facet |
Landini, F. Ferrer, L. Franco, H. Karpov A. Mporas I. Potapova R. ASM Solutions Ltd. |
author_sort |
Landini, F. |
title |
Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data |
title_short |
Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data |
title_full |
Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data |
title_fullStr |
Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data |
title_sort |
adaptation approaches for pronunciation scoring with sparse training data |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03029743_v10458LNAI_n_p87_Landini |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT landinif adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata AT ferrerl adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata AT francoh adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata AT karpova adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata AT mporasi adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata AT potapovar adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata AT asmsolutionsltd adaptationapproachesforpronunciationscoringwithsparsetrainingdata |
_version_ |
1807324537685016576 |