GPR-signal improvement using a Synthetic Emitter Array

We discuss improvements produced by a Synthetic Emitter Array on typical GPR reflection signals. We analyze their time and amplitude fluctuations and their intensity levels with respect to the surrounding signals. We compare the results of the method to those of the more usual Common Midpoint method...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cedrina, L., Bonomo, N., Osella, A.
Formato: JOUR
Materias:
GPR
Lateral continuity improvement
Signal to noise improvement
Synthetic Emitter Array method
Amplitude fluctuations
Common mid points
Emitter arrays
GPR reflection
Intensity levels
Relative phasis
Signal to noise improvements
Small objects
Soil parameters
computer simulation
electrical method
geophysical array
ground penetrating radar
signal processing
signal-to-noise ratio
soil mechanics
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09269851_v74_n2-3_p123_Cedrina
Aporte de:
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id todo:paper_09269851_v74_n2-3_p123_Cedrina
record_format dspace
spelling todo:paper_09269851_v74_n2-3_p123_Cedrina2023-10-03T15:46:51Z GPR-signal improvement using a Synthetic Emitter Array Cedrina, L. Bonomo, N. Osella, A. GPR Lateral continuity improvement Signal to noise improvement Synthetic Emitter Array method Amplitude fluctuations Common mid points Emitter arrays GPR reflection Intensity levels Lateral continuity improvement Relative phasis Signal to noise improvements Small objects Soil parameters computer simulation electrical method geophysical array ground penetrating radar signal processing signal-to-noise ratio soil mechanics We discuss improvements produced by a Synthetic Emitter Array on typical GPR reflection signals. We analyze their time and amplitude fluctuations and their intensity levels with respect to the surrounding signals. We compare the results of the method to those of the more usual Common Midpoint method, as well as the Single Offset results. We analyze diffractions at small objects and reflections at large interfaces for both simulated and real data. We evaluate the effects of different fluctuation levels in the soil parameters and the setting of the relative phases between the array components. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. Fil:Cedrina, L. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Bonomo, N. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Osella, A. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. JOUR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09269851_v74_n2-3_p123_Cedrina
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic GPR
Lateral continuity improvement
Signal to noise improvement
Synthetic Emitter Array method
Amplitude fluctuations
Common mid points
Emitter arrays
GPR reflection
Intensity levels
Lateral continuity improvement
Relative phasis
Signal to noise improvements
Small objects
Soil parameters
computer simulation
electrical method
geophysical array
ground penetrating radar
signal processing
signal-to-noise ratio
soil mechanics
spellingShingle GPR
Lateral continuity improvement
Signal to noise improvement
Synthetic Emitter Array method
Amplitude fluctuations
Common mid points
Emitter arrays
GPR reflection
Intensity levels
Lateral continuity improvement
Relative phasis
Signal to noise improvements
Small objects
Soil parameters
computer simulation
electrical method
geophysical array
ground penetrating radar
signal processing
signal-to-noise ratio
soil mechanics
Cedrina, L.
Bonomo, N.
Osella, A.
GPR-signal improvement using a Synthetic Emitter Array
topic_facet GPR
Lateral continuity improvement
Signal to noise improvement
Synthetic Emitter Array method
Amplitude fluctuations
Common mid points
Emitter arrays
GPR reflection
Intensity levels
Lateral continuity improvement
Relative phasis
Signal to noise improvements
Small objects
Soil parameters
computer simulation
electrical method
geophysical array
ground penetrating radar
signal processing
signal-to-noise ratio
soil mechanics
description We discuss improvements produced by a Synthetic Emitter Array on typical GPR reflection signals. We analyze their time and amplitude fluctuations and their intensity levels with respect to the surrounding signals. We compare the results of the method to those of the more usual Common Midpoint method, as well as the Single Offset results. We analyze diffractions at small objects and reflections at large interfaces for both simulated and real data. We evaluate the effects of different fluctuation levels in the soil parameters and the setting of the relative phases between the array components. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
format JOUR
author Cedrina, L.
Bonomo, N.
Osella, A.
author_facet Cedrina, L.
Bonomo, N.
Osella, A.
author_sort Cedrina, L.
title GPR-signal improvement using a Synthetic Emitter Array
title_short GPR-signal improvement using a Synthetic Emitter Array
title_full GPR-signal improvement using a Synthetic Emitter Array
title_fullStr GPR-signal improvement using a Synthetic Emitter Array
title_full_unstemmed GPR-signal improvement using a Synthetic Emitter Array
title_sort gpr-signal improvement using a synthetic emitter array
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09269851_v74_n2-3_p123_Cedrina
work_keys_str_mv AT cedrinal gprsignalimprovementusingasyntheticemitterarray
AT bonomon gprsignalimprovementusingasyntheticemitterarray
AT osellaa gprsignalimprovementusingasyntheticemitterarray
_version_ 1807321424677830656

Ejemplares similares