Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS

This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plastino, A., Rocca, M.C., Pennini, F.
Formato: JOUR
Materias:
Tsallis distributions
Probability distributions
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
Aporte de:
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id todo:paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
record_format dspace
spelling todo:paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino2023-10-03T16:42:20Z Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS Plastino, A. Rocca, M.C. Pennini, F. Tsallis distributions Probability distributions This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper does not coincide with the Tsallis distribution studied by Oikonomou and Bagci. Consequently, their findings do not apply to our paper. © 2017 American Physical Society. JOUR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Tsallis distributions
Probability distributions
spellingShingle Tsallis distributions
Probability distributions
Plastino, A.
Rocca, M.C.
Pennini, F.
Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
topic_facet Tsallis distributions
Probability distributions
description This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper does not coincide with the Tsallis distribution studied by Oikonomou and Bagci. Consequently, their findings do not apply to our paper. © 2017 American Physical Society.
format JOUR
author Plastino, A.
Rocca, M.C.
Pennini, F.
author_facet Plastino, A.
Rocca, M.C.
Pennini, F.
author_sort Plastino, A.
title Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
title_short Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
title_full Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
title_fullStr Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
title_full_unstemmed Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
title_sort reply to "comment on 'troublesome aspects of the renyi-maxent treatment' " comments comments
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
work_keys_str_mv AT plastinoa replytocommentontroublesomeaspectsoftherenyimaxenttreatmentcommentscomments
AT roccamc replytocommentontroublesomeaspectsoftherenyimaxenttreatmentcommentscomments
AT penninif replytocommentontroublesomeaspectsoftherenyimaxenttreatmentcommentscomments
_version_ 1807320153333956608

Ejemplares similares