Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS

This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plastino, A., Rocca, M.C., Pennini, F.
Formato: JOUR
Materias:
Tsallis distributions
Probability distributions
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
Aporte de:
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
Descripción
Sumario:This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper does not coincide with the Tsallis distribution studied by Oikonomou and Bagci. Consequently, their findings do not apply to our paper. © 2017 American Physical Society.

Ejemplares similares