Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Plastino, A., Rocca, M.C., Pennini, F. |
---|---|
Formato: | JOUR |
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino |
Aporte de: |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
Publicado: (2017) -
Reply to “Comment on ‘Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' ”
por: Plastino, Ángel Luis, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment
por: Plastino, A., et al. -
Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment
por: Plastino, Ángel Luis, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment
Publicado: (2016)